This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC
Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
index 9066e6df1ba1..21e15b88bae7 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
- qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
- qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
+ - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
- qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
- qcom,sm6375-smmu-500
- qcom,sm8150-smmu-500
--
2.37.3
On 01/10/2022 20:57, Martin Botka wrote:
> This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC
Do not use "This commit/patch".
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
Fix it in all your patches, please. It is just "Add binding for SM6125 SoC".
In the same time, your commit subject has redundant binding - first in
prefix, second (redundant) in "Add binding for". So just:
dt-bindings: iommu: arm-smmu: Add SM6125
Please fix both in all your patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <[email protected]>
With subject and commit msg fixes:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 2022-10-01 20:57:15, Martin Botka wrote:
> This patch adds binding for sm6125 SoC
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> index 9066e6df1ba1..21e15b88bae7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
> - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
> - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
> - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
> + - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
Shouldn't this be in the list above given that you switched the APPS to
smmu-v2 in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
Alas, I don't remember which of the two compatibles is correct for this
SoC, since both were seemingly working correctly...
- Marijn
> - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
> - qcom,sm6375-smmu-500
> - qcom,sm8150-smmu-500
> --
> 2.37.3
>