2022-10-08 17:36:41

by Frank Wunderlich

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: allow configuring uart rx/tx and rts/cts separately

From: Sam Shih <[email protected]>

Some mt7986 boards use uart rts/cts pins as gpio,
This patch allows to change rts/cts to gpio mode, but keep
rx/tx as UART function.

Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
index f26869f1a367..95f32e62e02f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt7986.c
@@ -675,11 +675,17 @@ static int mt7986_uart1_1_funcs[] = { 4, 4, 4, 4, };
static int mt7986_spi1_2_pins[] = { 29, 30, 31, 32, };
static int mt7986_spi1_2_funcs[] = { 1, 1, 1, 1, };

-static int mt7986_uart1_2_pins[] = { 29, 30, 31, 32, };
-static int mt7986_uart1_2_funcs[] = { 3, 3, 3, 3, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_2_rx_tx_pins[] = { 29, 30, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_2_rx_tx_funcs[] = { 3, 3, };

-static int mt7986_uart2_0_pins[] = { 29, 30, 31, 32, };
-static int mt7986_uart2_0_funcs[] = { 4, 4, 4, 4, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_2_cts_rts_pins[] = { 31, 32, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_2_cts_rts_funcs[] = { 3, 3, };
+
+static int mt7986_uart2_0_rx_tx_pins[] = { 29, 30, };
+static int mt7986_uart2_0_rx_tx_funcs[] = { 4, 4, };
+
+static int mt7986_uart2_0_cts_rts_pins[] = { 31, 32, };
+static int mt7986_uart2_0_cts_rts_funcs[] = { 4, 4, };

static int mt7986_spi0_pins[] = { 33, 34, 35, 36, };
static int mt7986_spi0_funcs[] = { 1, 1, 1, 1, };
@@ -708,6 +714,12 @@ static int mt7986_pcie_reset_funcs[] = { 1, };
static int mt7986_uart1_pins[] = { 42, 43, 44, 45, };
static int mt7986_uart1_funcs[] = { 1, 1, 1, 1, };

+static int mt7986_uart1_rx_tx_pins[] = { 42, 43, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_rx_tx_funcs[] = { 1, 1, };
+
+static int mt7986_uart1_cts_rts_pins[] = { 44, 45, };
+static int mt7986_uart1_cts_rts_funcs[] = { 1, 1, };
+
static int mt7986_uart2_pins[] = { 46, 47, 48, 49, };
static int mt7986_uart2_funcs[] = { 1, 1, 1, 1, };

@@ -749,6 +761,8 @@ static const struct group_desc mt7986_groups[] = {
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("wifi_led", mt7986_wifi_led),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("i2c", mt7986_i2c),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_0", mt7986_uart1_0),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_rx_tx", mt7986_uart1_rx_tx),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_cts_rts", mt7986_uart1_cts_rts),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("pcie_clk", mt7986_pcie_clk),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("pcie_wake", mt7986_pcie_wake),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("spi1_0", mt7986_spi1_0),
@@ -760,8 +774,10 @@ static const struct group_desc mt7986_groups[] = {
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("spi1_1", mt7986_spi1_1),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_1", mt7986_uart1_1),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("spi1_2", mt7986_spi1_2),
- PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_2", mt7986_uart1_2),
- PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart2_0", mt7986_uart2_0),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_2_rx_tx", mt7986_uart1_2_rx_tx),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart1_2_cts_rts", mt7986_uart1_2_cts_rts),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart2_0_rx_tx", mt7986_uart2_0_rx_tx),
+ PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart2_0_cts_rts", mt7986_uart2_0_cts_rts),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("spi0", mt7986_spi0),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("spi0_wp_hold", mt7986_spi0_wp_hold),
PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP("uart2_1", mt7986_uart2_1),
@@ -800,7 +816,9 @@ static const char *mt7986_pwm_groups[] = { "pwm0", "pwm1_0", "pwm1_1", };
static const char *mt7986_spi_groups[] = {
"spi0", "spi0_wp_hold", "spi1_0", "spi1_1", "spi1_2", "spi1_3", };
static const char *mt7986_uart_groups[] = {
- "uart1_0", "uart1_1", "uart1_2", "uart1_3_rx_tx", "uart1_3_cts_rts",
+ "uart1_0", "uart1_1", "uart1_rx_tx", "uart1_cts_rts",
+ "uart1_2_rx_tx", "uart1_2_cts_rts",
+ "uart1_3_rx_tx", "uart1_3_cts_rts", "uart2_0_rx_tx", "uart2_0_cts_rts",
"uart2_0", "uart2_1", "uart0", "uart1", "uart2",
};
static const char *mt7986_wdt_groups[] = { "watchdog", };
--
2.34.1


2022-10-17 09:46:51

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: allow configuring uart rx/tx and rts/cts separately

On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 6:48 PM Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
>
> Some mt7986 boards use uart rts/cts pins as gpio,
> This patch allows to change rts/cts to gpio mode, but keep
> rx/tx as UART function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <[email protected]>

No response from maintainers for a week and patch makes sense
so patch applied for next!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2022-10-17 10:22:38

by Chen-Yu Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: allow configuring uart rx/tx and rts/cts separately

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:42 PM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 6:48 PM Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
> >
> > Some mt7986 boards use uart rts/cts pins as gpio,
> > This patch allows to change rts/cts to gpio mode, but keep
> > rx/tx as UART function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
>
> No response from maintainers for a week and patch makes sense
> so patch applied for next!

Could we add "mt7986" to the patch subject? Otherwise it could be taken
to be updating all the SoCs.

ChenYu

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

2022-10-17 10:33:00

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: allow configuring uart rx/tx and rts/cts separately

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:49 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:42 PM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 6:48 PM Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Some mt7986 boards use uart rts/cts pins as gpio,
> > > This patch allows to change rts/cts to gpio mode, but keep
> > > rx/tx as UART function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sam Shih <[email protected]>
> >
> > No response from maintainers for a week and patch makes sense
> > so patch applied for next!
>
> Could we add "mt7986" to the patch subject? Otherwise it could be taken
> to be updating all the SoCs.

OK I fixed it!

Yours,
Linus Walleij