Use variable name 'index' instead of 'indx' for the index in the
core_data[] array.
No functional change expected.
Cc: [email protected]
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index ccf0af5b988a..bfdcfe8ccb34 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -515,15 +515,15 @@ coretemp_add_core(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
}
-static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx)
+static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int index)
{
- struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
+ struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[index];
/* Remove the sysfs attributes */
sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group);
- kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
- pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
+ kfree(pdata->core_data[index]);
+ pdata->core_data[index] = NULL;
}
static int coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
struct platform_data *pd;
struct temp_data *tdata;
- int indx, target;
+ int index, target;
/*
* Don't execute this on suspend as the device remove locks
@@ -661,12 +661,12 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
/* The core id is too big, just return */
- indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
- if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
+ index = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
+ if (index > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
return 0;
pd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- tdata = pd->core_data[indx];
+ tdata = pd->core_data[index];
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pd->cpumask);
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
*/
target = cpumask_any_and(&pd->cpumask, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
- coretemp_remove_core(pd, indx);
+ coretemp_remove_core(pd, index);
} else if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
tdata->cpu = target;
--
2.25.1
On 10/14/22 02:01, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Use variable name 'index' instead of 'indx' for the index in the
> core_data[] array.
>
> No functional change expected.
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index ccf0af5b988a..bfdcfe8ccb34 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -515,15 +515,15 @@ coretemp_add_core(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu);
> }
>
> -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx)
> +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int index)
> {
> - struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx];
> + struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[index];
>
> /* Remove the sysfs attributes */
> sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group);
>
> - kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]);
> - pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL;
> + kfree(pdata->core_data[index]);
> + pdata->core_data[index] = NULL;
> }
>
> static int coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> struct platform_data *pd;
> struct temp_data *tdata;
> - int indx, target;
> + int index, target;
>
> /*
> * Don't execute this on suspend as the device remove locks
> @@ -661,12 +661,12 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> return 0;
>
> /* The core id is too big, just return */
> - indx = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> - if (indx > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> + index = TO_ATTR_NO(cpu);
> + if (index > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1)
> return 0;
>
> pd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - tdata = pd->core_data[indx];
> + tdata = pd->core_data[index];
>
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &pd->cpumask);
>
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static int coretemp_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> */
> target = cpumask_any_and(&pd->cpumask, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> - coretemp_remove_core(pd, indx);
> + coretemp_remove_core(pd, index);
> } else if (tdata && tdata->cpu == cpu) {
> mutex_lock(&tdata->update_lock);
> tdata->cpu = target;
On 10/14/22 02:01, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Use variable name 'index' instead of 'indx' for the index in the
> core_data[] array.
>
> No functional change expected.
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
Hi,
Thanks for paring this series down.
I think I'm also going to pull this patch out of the series before I
apply it and just rework 2/4 to apply cleanly without it. I just can't
put this in our "urgent" fixes pile and keep the stable@ tag on such a
trivial rename and keep a straight face.
On 10/14/22 10:12, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/14/22 02:01, Zhang Rui wrote:
>> Use variable name 'index' instead of 'indx' for the index in the
>> core_data[] array.
>>
>> No functional change expected.
>>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for paring this series down.
>
> I think I'm also going to pull this patch out of the series before I
> apply it and just rework 2/4 to apply cleanly without it. I just can't
> put this in our "urgent" fixes pile and keep the stable@ tag on such a
> trivial rename and keep a straight face.
>
To be fair, this patch was only submitted as a prerequisite to the next
patch in the series because someone had objected to the use of both 'indx'
and 'index' in the driver.
Guenter
Hi, Dave,
Thanks for taking care of this.
That totally works for me.
thanks,
rui
On Fri, 2022-10-14 at 10:20 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/14/22 10:12, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 10/14/22 02:01, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > Use variable name 'index' instead of 'indx' for the index in the
> > > core_data[] array.
> > >
> > > No functional change expected.
> > >
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <[email protected]>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for paring this series down.
> >
> > I think I'm also going to pull this patch out of the series before
> > I
> > apply it and just rework 2/4 to apply cleanly without it. I just
> > can't
> > put this in our "urgent" fixes pile and keep the stable@ tag on
> > such a
> > trivial rename and keep a straight face.
> >
>
> To be fair, this patch was only submitted as a prerequisite to the
> next
> patch in the series because someone had objected to the use of both
> 'indx'
> and 'index' in the driver.
>
> Guenter
>