Delete the repeated word "that" in comments.
Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <[email protected]>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 27a3f29c0181..2ad2fec6ed3f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7053,7 +7053,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
/*
* There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
- * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
+ * enough pages are already being scanned that high
* watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
*/
if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))
--
2.35.1
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 06:04:31AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete the repeated word "that" in comments.
>
Meh...
On what comment?
Also, on patch subject, s/rebundant/redundant/.
> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 27a3f29c0181..2ad2fec6ed3f 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -7053,7 +7053,7 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int highest_zoneidx)
Ah! You mean balance_pgdat().
>
> /*
> * There should be no need to raise the scanning priority if
> - * enough pages are already being scanned that that high
> + * enough pages are already being scanned that high
> * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
> */
> if (kswapd_shrink_node(pgdat, &sc))
Dunno if the comment above is right.
I have already say to fellow @cdjrlc.com people that you and your team
**IGNORE** patch reviews. If you don't reply to this review, I would like
to just say NAK.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 06:04:31AM -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> Delete the repeated word "that" in comments.
I think you've misunderstood the comment. NAK.