Hello Linus,
I've been trying since July to get this regression that was introduced in
5.14 fixed. This is my third time submitting this version of the patch in the
last two months. Both prior submissions have not received any comments from
(nor have they been applied by) the x86 maintainers. I don't really know
what else to do at this point beyond "complain to the management" as it
were.
I appreciate anything you can do to unjam things here.
- Kyle
On 11/7/22 12:49, Slade Watkins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 1:38 AM Kyle Huey <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've been trying since July to get this regression that was introduced in
>> 5.14 fixed. This is my third time submitting this version of the patch in the
>> last two months. Both prior submissions have not received any comments from
>> (nor have they been applied by) the x86 maintainers. I don't really know
>> what else to do at this point beyond "complain to the management" as it
>> were.
>>
>> I appreciate anything you can do to unjam things here.
> Maintainers: is there any reason why this hasn't been applied, or
> received comments? I'm confused and a bit worried.
Thomas had some strong opinions in the area, so I've been neglecting it.
I'll put it in my queue to take a look now, though.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 1:38 AM Kyle Huey <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been trying since July to get this regression that was introduced in
> 5.14 fixed. This is my third time submitting this version of the patch in the
> last two months. Both prior submissions have not received any comments from
> (nor have they been applied by) the x86 maintainers. I don't really know
> what else to do at this point beyond "complain to the management" as it
> were.
>
> I appreciate anything you can do to unjam things here.
Maintainers: is there any reason why this hasn't been applied, or
received comments? I'm confused and a bit worried.
-srw
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 3:52 PM Dave Hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thomas had some strong opinions in the area, so I've been neglecting it.
> I'll put it in my queue to take a look now, though.
Awesome, thanks.
-srw