2022-11-24 06:41:42

by Cindy Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] vhost_vdpa: fix the crash in unmap a large memory

While testing in vIOMMU, sometimes guest will unmap very large memory,
which will cause the crash. To fix this,Move the iommu_unmap to
vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap/vhost_vdpa_va_unmap and only unmap the memory
that saved in iotlb.

Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index 166044642fd5..c392979702cf 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
struct page *page;
unsigned long pfn, pinned;
+ struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
+ const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;

while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
pinned = PFN_DOWN(map->size);
@@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
unpin_user_page(page);
}
atomic64_sub(PFN_DOWN(map->size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
+ if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
+ iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
}
}
@@ -713,11 +717,15 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_va_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
{
struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
struct vdpa_map_file *map_file;
+ struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
+ const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;

while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
fput(map_file->file);
kfree(map_file);
+ if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
+ iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
}
}
@@ -805,8 +813,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
} else if (ops->set_map) {
if (!v->in_batch)
ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
- } else {
- iommu_unmap(v->domain, iova, size);
}

/* If we are in the middle of batch processing, delay the free
--
2.34.3


2022-11-24 07:20:07

by Cindy Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost_vdpa: fix the crash in unmap a large memory

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 at 14:34, Jason Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:23 PM Cindy Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > While testing in vIOMMU, sometimes guest will unmap very large memory,
> > which will cause the crash.
>
> Would you mind to post the calltrace?
>
Sure, Will add this, Thanks Jason

> > To fix this,Move the iommu_unmap to
> > vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap/vhost_vdpa_va_unmap and only unmap the memory
> > that saved in iotlb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <[email protected]>
>
> Let's add a fixes tag which I believe should be the first commit that
> introduces vhost-vDPA. And let's cc stable as well.
>
sure, will do.
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > index 166044642fd5..c392979702cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> > @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> > struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
> > struct page *page;
> > unsigned long pfn, pinned;
> > + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
> >
> > while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
> > pinned = PFN_DOWN(map->size);
> > @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> > unpin_user_page(page);
> > }
> > atomic64_sub(PFN_DOWN(map->size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
> > + if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> > + iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
> > vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -713,11 +717,15 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_va_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> > {
> > struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
> > struct vdpa_map_file *map_file;
> > + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> > + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
> >
> > while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
> > map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
> > fput(map_file->file);
> > kfree(map_file);
> > + if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> > + iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
>
> I wonder if it's better to move at least dma_map() here.
>
> Thanks
>
sure, will remove this , thanks will provide a new version soon
> > vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -805,8 +813,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> > } else if (ops->set_map) {
> > if (!v->in_batch)
> > ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
> > - } else {
> > - iommu_unmap(v->domain, iova, size);
> > }
> >
> > /* If we are in the middle of batch processing, delay the free
> > --
> > 2.34.3
> >
>

2022-11-24 07:23:22

by Jason Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost_vdpa: fix the crash in unmap a large memory

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:23 PM Cindy Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> While testing in vIOMMU, sometimes guest will unmap very large memory,
> which will cause the crash.

Would you mind to post the calltrace?

> To fix this,Move the iommu_unmap to
> vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap/vhost_vdpa_va_unmap and only unmap the memory
> that saved in iotlb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <[email protected]>

Let's add a fixes tag which I believe should be the first commit that
introduces vhost-vDPA. And let's cc stable as well.

> ---
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 166044642fd5..c392979702cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long pfn, pinned;
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>
> while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
> pinned = PFN_DOWN(map->size);
> @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> unpin_user_page(page);
> }
> atomic64_sub(PFN_DOWN(map->size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
> + if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> + iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
> vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
> }
> }
> @@ -713,11 +717,15 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_va_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> {
> struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
> struct vdpa_map_file *map_file;
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>
> while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
> map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
> fput(map_file->file);
> kfree(map_file);
> + if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> + iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);

I wonder if it's better to move at least dma_map() here.

Thanks

> vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
> }
> }
> @@ -805,8 +813,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
> } else if (ops->set_map) {
> if (!v->in_batch)
> ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
> - } else {
> - iommu_unmap(v->domain, iova, size);
> }
>
> /* If we are in the middle of batch processing, delay the free
> --
> 2.34.3
>