2022-12-01 03:06:19

by ye.xingchen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()

From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>

Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
index def7302ef7fe..2b7aaaefb3a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
@@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ static int mitigations_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
bool enable;

if (!local)
- return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", "off");
+ return sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s\n", "off");

if (local & BIT(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
- count = scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s,", "auto");
+ count = sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s,", "auto");
enable = false;
} else {
enable = true;
--
2.25.1


2022-12-05 11:11:53

by Jani Nikula

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()

On Thu, 01 Dec 2022, <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
>
> Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.

I was going to push this, but noticed the function has a third
scnprintf(), and the last two play together with count. It would be
confusing to have a mix of sysfs_emit() and scnprintf(). The third one
can't be blindly converted to sysfs_emit() because it writes at an
offset not aligned by PAGE_SIZE.

So I'm not taking this.

BR,
Jani.

>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> index def7302ef7fe..2b7aaaefb3a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> @@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ static int mitigations_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> bool enable;
>
> if (!local)
> - return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", "off");
> + return sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s\n", "off");
>
> if (local & BIT(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> - count = scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s,", "auto");
> + count = sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s,", "auto");
> enable = false;
> } else {
> enable = true;

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

2022-12-06 04:50:42

by Bagas Sanjaya

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 12:50:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2022, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: ye xingchen <[email protected]>
> >
> > Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.
>
> I was going to push this, but noticed the function has a third
> scnprintf(), and the last two play together with count. It would be
> confusing to have a mix of sysfs_emit() and scnprintf(). The third one
> can't be blindly converted to sysfs_emit() because it writes at an
> offset not aligned by PAGE_SIZE.
>
> So I'm not taking this.
>

Hi Jani,

Fortunately you'd NAKed this patch from ZTE people, which are known for
ignoring your (and others) patch review. Remember that they were used to
send from cgel.zte gmail account [1], which after the address was banned
from LKML, they tried to send from their own corporate account but Greg
suspected that emails sent from them are spoofed [2].

Thanks.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y3NqyDDGz%[email protected]/

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.13 kB)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments