2022-12-08 02:22:09

by Jiasheng Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

As kzalloc may return NULL pointer, the return value should
be checked and return error if fails in order to avoid the
NULL pointer dereference.
Moreover, use the goto-label to share the clean code.

Fixes: d6b98c8d242a ("ice: add write functionality for GNSS TTY")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:

v1 -> v2:

1. Use goto-label to share the clean code.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c | 25 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
index b5a7f246d230..7bd3452a16d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
const int ICE_TTYDRV_NAME_MAX = 14;
struct tty_driver *tty_driver;
char *ttydrv_name;
- unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int i, j;
int err;

tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES,
@@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
GFP_KERNEL);
pf->gnss_serial[i] = NULL;

+ if (!pf->gnss_tty_port[i])
+ goto err_out;
+
tty_port_init(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
tty_port_link_device(pf->gnss_tty_port[i], tty_driver, i);
}
@@ -469,21 +472,23 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
err = tty_register_driver(tty_driver);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to register TTY driver err=%d\n", err);
-
- for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++) {
- tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
- kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
- }
- kfree(ttydrv_name);
- tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
-
- return NULL;
+ goto err_out;
}

for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++)
dev_info(dev, "%s%d registered\n", ttydrv_name, i);

return tty_driver;
+
+err_out:
+ for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
+ tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
+ kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
+ }
+ kfree(ttydrv_name);
+ tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
+
+ return NULL;
}

/**
--
2.25.1


2022-12-08 09:38:39

by Leon Romanovsky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:19:36AM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As kzalloc may return NULL pointer, the return value should
> be checked and return error if fails in order to avoid the
> NULL pointer dereference.
> Moreover, use the goto-label to share the clean code.
>
> Fixes: d6b98c8d242a ("ice: add write functionality for GNSS TTY")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. Use goto-label to share the clean code.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c | 25 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> index b5a7f246d230..7bd3452a16d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
> const int ICE_TTYDRV_NAME_MAX = 14;
> struct tty_driver *tty_driver;
> char *ttydrv_name;
> - unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int i, j;
> int err;
>
> tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES,
> @@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
> GFP_KERNEL);
> pf->gnss_serial[i] = NULL;
>
> + if (!pf->gnss_tty_port[i])
> + goto err_out;
> +
> tty_port_init(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
> tty_port_link_device(pf->gnss_tty_port[i], tty_driver, i);
> }
> @@ -469,21 +472,23 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
> err = tty_register_driver(tty_driver);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to register TTY driver err=%d\n", err);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++) {
> - tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
> - kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
> - }
> - kfree(ttydrv_name);
> - tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
> -
> - return NULL;
> + goto err_out;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++)
> dev_info(dev, "%s%d registered\n", ttydrv_name, i);
>
> return tty_driver;
> +
> +err_out:
> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {

You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.

Thanks

> + tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
> + kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
> + }
> + kfree(ttydrv_name);
> + tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
> +
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>

2022-12-08 10:25:02

by Jiasheng Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:25:02PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> +err_out:
>> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
>
> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.

No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].
If using "while(i--)", the code should be "tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i - 1]);".
It will be more complex.
Therefore, it is worthwhile to use an extra varaible.

Thanks,
Jiang

2022-12-08 11:37:51

by Jiri Pirko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:06:03AM CET, [email protected] wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:25:02PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> +err_out:
>>> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
>>
>> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.
>
>No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].

Are you sure??


>If using "while(i--)", the code should be "tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i - 1]);".
>It will be more complex.
>Therefore, it is worthwhile to use an extra varaible.
>
>Thanks,
>Jiang
>

2022-12-08 13:42:51

by Jiasheng Jiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:17:59PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> +err_out:
>>>> + for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
>>>
>>> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.
>>
>>No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].
>
> Are you sure??

Yes, you are right.
I will submit a v3 to add this change.

Thanks,
Jiang