Add support for ACPI based device registration so that the driver
can be also enabled through ACPI table.
While at that change the DT specific API's to device_* API's so that
both DT based and ACPI based probing works.
Signed-off-by: Gowthami Thiagarajan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
index 69c3050a4348..b1f5580e070a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#define TAD_PFC_OFFSET 0x800
#define TAD_PFC(counter) (TAD_PFC_OFFSET | (counter << 3))
@@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *tad_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
static int tad_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct tad_region *regions;
struct tad_pmu *tad_pmu;
struct resource *res;
@@ -276,21 +277,21 @@ static int tad_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}
- ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "marvell,tad-page-size",
- &tad_page_size);
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "marvell,tad-page-size",
+ &tad_page_size);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't find tad-page-size property\n");
return ret;
}
- ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "marvell,tad-pmu-page-size",
- &tad_pmu_page_size);
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "marvell,tad-pmu-page-size",
+ &tad_pmu_page_size);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't find tad-pmu-page-size property\n");
return ret;
}
- ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "marvell,tad-cnt", &tad_cnt);
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "marvell,tad-cnt", &tad_cnt);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't find tad-cnt property\n");
return ret;
@@ -369,10 +370,19 @@ static const struct of_device_id tad_pmu_of_match[] = {
};
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+static const struct acpi_device_id tad_pmu_acpi_match[] = {
+ {"MRVL000B", 0},
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tad_pmu_acpi_match);
+#endif
+
static struct platform_driver tad_pmu_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "cn10k_tad_pmu",
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tad_pmu_of_match),
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(tad_pmu_acpi_match),
.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
},
.probe = tad_pmu_probe,
--
2.25.1
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 11:07:15 +0530, Gowthami Thiagarajan wrote:
> Add support for ACPI based device registration so that the driver
> can be also enabled through ACPI table.
> While at that change the DT specific API's to device_* API's so that
> both DT based and ACPI based probing works.
>
>
Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
[1/1] perf/marvell: Add ACPI support to TAD uncore driver
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/093cf1f62fe8
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev