From: Lareine Khawaly <[email protected]>
In functions i2c_dw_scl_lcnt() and i2c_dw_scl_hcnt() may have overflow
by depending on the values of the given parameters including the ic_clk.
For example in our usecase where ic_clk >= 1000000, multiplication of
ic_clk * 4700 will result in 32 bit overflow.
This commit change the ic_clk to be u64 parameter to avoid the overflow.
Signed-off-by: Lareine Khawaly <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 4 ++--
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 4 ++--
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
index c023b691441e..61a6b7bb8935 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ void i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed);
-u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset)
+u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u64 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset)
{
/*
* DesignWare I2C core doesn't seem to have solid strategy to meet
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset)
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(ic_clk * (tSYMBOL + tf), MICRO) - 3 + offset;
}
-u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset)
+u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u64 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset)
{
/*
* Conditional expression:
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
index 4d3a3b464ecd..aaba6f9977b6 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h
@@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks {
};
int i2c_dw_init_regmap(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
-u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset);
-u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u32 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset);
+u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(u64 ic_clk, u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset);
+u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(u64 ic_clk, u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset);
int i2c_dw_set_sda_hold(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
unsigned long i2c_dw_clk_rate(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
int i2c_dw_prepare_clk(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool prepare);
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
index 478318b1d35f..d6960507ea46 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-master.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_set_timings_master(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
u32 sda_falling_time, scl_falling_time;
struct i2c_timings *t = &dev->timings;
const char *fp_str = "";
- u32 ic_clk;
+ u64 ic_clk;
int ret;
ret = i2c_dw_acquire_lock(dev);
--
2.38.1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:34:18AM +0000, Hanna Hawa wrote:
> From: Lareine Khawaly <[email protected]>
>
> In functions i2c_dw_scl_lcnt() and i2c_dw_scl_hcnt() may have overflow
> by depending on the values of the given parameters including the ic_clk.
> For example in our usecase where ic_clk >= 1000000, multiplication of
It's hard to count 0:s, can you use plain words instead (like million, billion)?
> ic_clk * 4700 will result in 32 bit overflow.
> This commit change the ic_clk to be u64 parameter to avoid the overflow.
Read Submitting Patches about imperative mood in the commit messages.
...
Smells like you are missing the Fixes tag.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko