This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.10.160-rc1
Lei Rao <[email protected]>
nvme-pci: clear the prp2 field when not used
Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
ASoC: cs42l51: Correct PGA Volume minimum value
Yasushi SHOJI <[email protected]>
can: mcba_usb: Fix termination command argument
Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>
can: sja1000: fix size of OCR_MODE_MASK define
Ricardo Ribalda <[email protected]>
pinctrl: meditatek: Startup with the IRQs disabled
Hou Tao <[email protected]>
libbpf: Use page size as max_entries when probing ring buffer map
Mark Brown <[email protected]>
ASoC: ops: Check bounds for second channel in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()
Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear CHnF flags
Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
ASoC: fsl_micfil: explicitly clear software reset bit
Bing-Jhong Billy Jheng <[email protected]>
io_uring: add missing item types for splice request
Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
fuse: always revalidate if exclusive create
Jialiang Wang <[email protected]>
nfp: fix use-after-free in area_cache_get()
Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
vfs: fix copy_file_range() averts filesystem freeze protection
Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
vfs: fix copy_file_range() regression in cross-fs copies
Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 2 -
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 +
drivers/net/can/usb/mcba_usb.c | 10 ++-
.../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfpcore/nfp_cppcore.c | 3 +-
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 2 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 9 ++-
fs/fuse/dir.c | 2 +-
fs/io_uring.c | 2 +-
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 8 +-
fs/read_write.c | 90 +++++++++++++---------
include/linux/can/platform/sja1000.h | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 8 ++
sound/soc/codecs/cs42l51.c | 2 +-
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_micfil.c | 19 +++++
sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 6 ++
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 2 +-
17 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 12/15/22 11:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.10.160-rc1 tested.
Run tested on:
- Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)
In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <[email protected]>
--
Rudi
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <[email protected]>
Thanks.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.160-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: a66782e1af759c5fff50b1b382ff4e34fe8fe158
* git describe: v5.10.159-16-ga66782e1af75
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.159-16-ga66782e1af75
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.158-99-g2c8c8e98b2ec)
## Test result summary
total: 141503, pass: 122877, fail: 2557, skip: 15573, xfail: 496
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 148 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 25 passed, 7 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 40 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:10:27 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.160-rc1-ga66782e1af75
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>
Jon
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2362
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2366
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On 12/15/22 10:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 07:10:27PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.160 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Dec 2022 17:28:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter