reclaim_period_ms use to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
Change validation to allow only positive input.
Fixes: 0001725d0f9b ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation")
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Ben Gardon <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <[email protected]>
---
v2:
- Added Fixes and Reviewed-by tags
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
index ea0978f22db8..251794f83719 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hp:t:r")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'p':
- reclaim_period_ms = atoi_non_negative("Reclaim period", optarg);
+ reclaim_period_ms = atoi_positive("Reclaim period", optarg);
break;
case 't':
token = atoi_paranoid(optarg);
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> reclaim_period_ms use to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
> ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
> validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
>
> Change validation to allow only positive input.
>
> Fixes: 0001725d0f9b ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation")
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Ben Gardon <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <[email protected]>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:34:08 -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> reclaim_period_ms use to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
> ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
> validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
>
> Change validation to allow only positive input.
>
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: selftests: Make reclaim_period_ms input always be positive
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/4dfd8e37fa0f
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:10 PM Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:34:08 -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > reclaim_period_ms use to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
> > ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
> > validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
> >
> > Change validation to allow only positive input.
> >
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!
Just FYI, this patch has already been applied to kvm/master branch.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/commit/?id=c2c46b10d52624376322b01654095a84611c7e09
>
> [1/1] KVM: selftests: Make reclaim_period_ms input always be positive
> https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/4dfd8e37fa0f
>
> --
> https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
> https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:10 PM Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:34:08 -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > > reclaim_period_ms use to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
> > > ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
> > > validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
> > >
> > > Change validation to allow only positive input.
> > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied to kvm-x86 selftests, thanks!
>
> Just FYI, this patch has already been applied to kvm/master branch.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/commit/?id=c2c46b10d52624376322b01654095a84611c7e09
Now I know why I was getting deja vu... Dropped, thanks Vipin!