2023-01-21 20:37:30

by Markuss Broks

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct inaccuracies in Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 device trees

Use the proper compatibles for the DSI host controller and MIPI
video phy, as the current ones are not compatible with the hardware.

While this fixes the kernel panic while trying to use DSI, I was still
unsuccessful to consistently produce image that isn't noise on S6E3FA2
panel of Samsung Galaxy S5. It seems to only work sometimes.

Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

v1 -> v2:
- squash patch 1 and patch 3, making it one patch for adding the label and
changing the compatible
- use better subject prefixes

Markuss Broks (2):
arm: dts: exynos5420: Use Exynos5420 compatible for the MIPI video phy
arm: dts: exynos5800: Use Exynos5422 compatible for the DSI controller

arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 4 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
2.39.0


2023-01-21 21:04:12

by Markuss Broks

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: dts: exynos5800: Use Exynos5422 compatible for the DSI controller

The driver adding support for Exynos5422/Exynos5800 DSI controller was
merged in 2016, yet it wasn't actually used. Add a proper compatible
for it.

Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 62263eb91b3c..b612468515eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ mipi_phy: mipi-video-phy {
#phy-cells = <1>;
};

- dsi@14500000 {
+ dsi: dsi@14500000 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-mipi-dsi";
reg = <0x14500000 0x10000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 82 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
index 526729dad53f..8328ddb3b02f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
@@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ opp-200000000 {
};
};

+&dsi {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos5422-mipi-dsi";
+};
+
&mfc {
compatible = "samsung,mfc-v8";
};
--
2.39.0

2023-01-23 15:37:24

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct inaccuracies in Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 device trees

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 22:18:41 +0200, Markuss Broks wrote:
> Use the proper compatibles for the DSI host controller and MIPI
> video phy, as the current ones are not compatible with the hardware.
>
> While this fixes the kernel panic while trying to use DSI, I was still
> unsuccessful to consistently produce image that isn't noise on S6E3FA2
> panel of Samsung Galaxy S5. It seems to only work sometimes.
>
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] arm: dts: exynos5420: Use Exynos5420 compatible for the MIPI video phy
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/bf5de14225625627a35d1acb6739068fc126326f
[2/2] arm: dts: exynos5800: Use Exynos5422 compatible for the DSI controller
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/234b8dac096d74e330ed1266956c756efddf3676

Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

2023-01-24 10:38:09

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct inaccuracies in Exynos5420 and Exynos5800 device trees

On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 22:18:41 +0200, Markuss Broks wrote:
> Use the proper compatibles for the DSI host controller and MIPI
> video phy, as the current ones are not compatible with the hardware.
>
> While this fixes the kernel panic while trying to use DSI, I was still
> unsuccessful to consistently produce image that isn't noise on S6E3FA2
> panel of Samsung Galaxy S5. It seems to only work sometimes.
>
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] arm: dts: exynos5420: Use Exynos5420 compatible for the MIPI video phy
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/bf5de14225625627a35d1acb6739068fc126326f
[2/2] arm: dts: exynos5800: Use Exynos5422 compatible for the DSI controller
https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/234b8dac096d74e330ed1266956c756efddf3676

Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>