2023-02-07 01:48:22

by Moudy Ho (何宗原)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/1] Migrate MT8195 VPPSYS 0/1 to mtk-mmsys drive

Change since v6:
- Rebase on linux-next.
- Drop applied patches [1/4], [2/4] and [4/4].
- In response to the API changes of "mtk_clk_register_gates" and
"mtk_alloc_clk_data", the patch [3/4] has been modified accordingly.

Change since v5:
- Rebase on linux-next.
- Correct the compatible enumeration order in "mediatek,mmsys.yaml".

Hi,

This series splits patches from the original mailing list below:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=711592

Refer to the comments of 0/8 and 1/8 in the following series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=702518
All about the MT8195 VPPSYS 0/1 should be probed from the "mtk-mmsys"
driver, which then starts its own clock driver as the platform driver.

Moudy Ho (1):
clk: mediatek: remove MT8195 vppsys/0/1 simple_probe

drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--
2.18.0



2023-02-07 01:48:24

by Moudy Ho (何宗原)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/1] clk: mediatek: remove MT8195 vppsys/0/1 simple_probe

MT8195 VPPSYS0/1 will be probed by the compatible name in
the mtk-mmsys driver and then probe its own clock driver as
a platform driver.

Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c
index bf2939c3a0230..debff9a8c071a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp0.c
@@ -86,26 +86,54 @@ static const struct mtk_gate vpp0_clks[] = {
GATE_VPP0_2(CLK_VPP0_WARP1_MDP_DL_ASYNC, "vpp0_warp1_mdp_dl_async", "top_wpe_vpp", 3),
};

-static const struct mtk_clk_desc vpp0_desc = {
- .clks = vpp0_clks,
- .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(vpp0_clks),
-};
+static int clk_mt8195_vpp0_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+ int r;

-static const struct of_device_id of_match_clk_mt8195_vpp0[] = {
- {
- .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0",
- .data = &vpp0_desc,
- }, {
- /* sentinel */
- }
-};
+ clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_VPP0_NR_CLK);
+ if (!clk_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r = mtk_clk_register_gates(&pdev->dev, node, vpp0_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp0_clks), clk_data);
+ if (r)
+ goto free_vpp0_data;
+
+ r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
+ if (r)
+ goto unregister_gates;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, clk_data);
+
+ return r;
+
+unregister_gates:
+ mtk_clk_unregister_gates(vpp0_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp0_clks), clk_data);
+free_vpp0_data:
+ mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int clk_mt8195_vpp0_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ of_clk_del_provider(node);
+ mtk_clk_unregister_gates(vpp0_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp0_clks), clk_data);
+ mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
+
+ return 0;
+}

static struct platform_driver clk_mt8195_vpp0_drv = {
- .probe = mtk_clk_simple_probe,
- .remove = mtk_clk_simple_remove,
+ .probe = clk_mt8195_vpp0_probe,
+ .remove = clk_mt8195_vpp0_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "clk-mt8195-vpp0",
- .of_match_table = of_match_clk_mt8195_vpp0,
},
};
builtin_platform_driver(clk_mt8195_vpp0_drv);
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c
index ffd52c7628909..beacbd94ef02a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vpp1.c
@@ -84,26 +84,54 @@ static const struct mtk_gate vpp1_clks[] = {
GATE_VPP1_1(CLK_VPP1_VPP_SPLIT_26M, "vpp1_vpp_split_26m", "clk26m", 26),
};

-static const struct mtk_clk_desc vpp1_desc = {
- .clks = vpp1_clks,
- .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(vpp1_clks),
-};
+static int clk_mt8195_vpp1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+ int r;

-static const struct of_device_id of_match_clk_mt8195_vpp1[] = {
- {
- .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1",
- .data = &vpp1_desc,
- }, {
- /* sentinel */
- }
-};
+ clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_VPP1_NR_CLK);
+ if (!clk_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r = mtk_clk_register_gates(&pdev->dev, node, vpp1_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp1_clks), clk_data);
+ if (r)
+ goto free_vpp1_data;
+
+ r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
+ if (r)
+ goto unregister_gates;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, clk_data);
+
+ return r;
+
+unregister_gates:
+ mtk_clk_unregister_gates(vpp1_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp1_clks), clk_data);
+free_vpp1_data:
+ mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int clk_mt8195_vpp1_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *node = dev->parent->of_node;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ of_clk_del_provider(node);
+ mtk_clk_unregister_gates(vpp1_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(vpp1_clks), clk_data);
+ mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
+
+ return 0;
+}

static struct platform_driver clk_mt8195_vpp1_drv = {
- .probe = mtk_clk_simple_probe,
- .remove = mtk_clk_simple_remove,
+ .probe = clk_mt8195_vpp1_probe,
+ .remove = clk_mt8195_vpp1_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "clk-mt8195-vpp1",
- .of_match_table = of_match_clk_mt8195_vpp1,
},
};
builtin_platform_driver(clk_mt8195_vpp1_drv);
--
2.18.0


2023-02-07 04:29:40

by Chen-Yu Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] clk: mediatek: remove MT8195 vppsys/0/1 simple_probe

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:48 AM Moudy Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> MT8195 VPPSYS0/1 will be probed by the compatible name in
> the mtk-mmsys driver and then probe its own clock driver as
> a platform driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>

Stephen, could you pick this up for v6.3? Otherwise we'll end up with
two drivers targeting the same compatible strings.

Thanks

2023-02-11 00:09:52

by Stephen Boyd

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] clk: mediatek: remove MT8195 vppsys/0/1 simple_probe

Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2023-02-06 20:29:21)
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 9:48 AM Moudy Ho <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > MT8195 VPPSYS0/1 will be probed by the compatible name in
> > the mtk-mmsys driver and then probe its own clock driver as
> > a platform driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
>
> Stephen, could you pick this up for v6.3? Otherwise we'll end up with
> two drivers targeting the same compatible strings.
>

I applied v6 after fixing it by hand.