The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for
accessing the (Control and Status Regsiters) CSRs of each LLCC bank.
This offset only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver support
was initially added.
But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the
banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register
stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a
crash with the current drivers. So far this crash is not reported since
EDAC_QCOM driver is not enabled in ARM64 defconfig and no one tested the
driver extensively by triggering the EDAC IRQ (that's where each bank
CSRs are accessed).
For fixing this issue, let's obtain the base address of each LLCC bank from
devicetree and get rid of the fixed stride.
This series has been tested on SM8250, SM8450, SM6350, SC8280XP, SA8540P,
and SDM845.
Merging strategy
----------------
All patches should be merged to qcom tree due to LLCC dependency.
Thanks,
Mani
Changes in v8:
* Added the ECC polling support patch that was missed in v7
Changes in v7:
* Rebased on top of v6.3-rc1
* Dropped the patches applied for v6.3
* Dropped Sai from the binding maintainers list since he left Qcom
Changes in v6:
* Incorporated comments from Borislav for the EDAC patches and collected
review tags.
Changes in v5:
* Reduced the size of llcc0 to 0x45000 on SDM845 due to overlapping with BWMON
* Added a patch to disable creation of EDAC platform device on SDM845
* Rebase on top of v6.2-rc1
* Moved the EDAC specific patches to the start so that they can be applied
independently of LLCC patches
Changes in v4:
* Added a patch that fixes the use-after-free bug in qcom_edac driver
Changes in v3:
* Brought back reg-names property for compatibility (Krzysztof)
* Removed Fixes tag and stable list as backporting the drivers/binding/dts
patches alone would break (Krzysztof)
* Fixed the uninitialized variable issue (Kbot)
* Added a patch to make use of driver supplied polling interval (Luca)
* Added a patch for module autoloading (Andrew)
* Didn't collect Review tags from Sai as the dts patches were changed.
Changes in v2:
* Removed reg-names property and used index of reg property to parse LLCC
bank base address (Bjorn)
* Collected Ack from Sai for binding
* Added a new patch for polling mode (Luca)
* Renamed subject of patches targeting SC7180 and SM6350
Manivannan Sadhasivam (14):
dt-bindings: arm: msm: Update the maintainers for LLCC
dt-bindings: arm: msm: Fix register regions used for LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
qcom: llcc/edac: Fix the base address used for accessing LLCC banks
qcom: llcc/edac: Support polling mode for ECC handling
soc: qcom: llcc: Do not create EDAC platform device on SDM845
.../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml | 128 ++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 5 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 10 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 7 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 7 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 7 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 7 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 7 +-
drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 64 +++++----
drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 87 +++++++-----
include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h | 6 +-
13 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Both Rishabh and Sai have left Qualcomm, and there is no evidence of them
maintaining with a new identity. So their entry needs to be removed.
Listed Bjorn as the interim maintainer until someone volunteers to maintain
this binding.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
index 38efcad56dbd..6570b808fd0d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
title: Last Level Cache Controller
maintainers:
- - Rishabh Bhatnagar <[email protected]>
- - Sai Prakash Ranjan <[email protected]>
+ - Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
description: |
LLCC (Last Level Cache Controller) provides last level of cache memory in SoC,
--
2.25.1
Register regions of the LLCC banks are located at different addresses.
Currently, the binding just lists the LLCC0 base address and tries to
cover all the banks using a single size. This is entirely wrong as there
are other register regions that happen to lie inside the size covered by
the binding such as the memory controller and holes.
So this needs to be fixed by specifying the base address of individual
LLCC banks. This approach will break the existing users of this binding
as the register regions are split and the drivers now cannot use
LLCC0 register region for accessing rest of the banks (which is wrong
anyway).
But considering the fact that the binding was wrong from the day one and
also the device drivers going wrong by the binding, this breakage is
acceptable.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml | 125 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
index 6570b808fd0d..93b977428a14 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml
@@ -33,14 +33,12 @@ properties:
- qcom,sm8550-llcc
reg:
- items:
- - description: LLCC base register region
- - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 9
reg-names:
- items:
- - const: llcc_base
- - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+ minItems: 2
+ maxItems: 9
interrupts:
maxItems: 1
@@ -50,15 +48,120 @@ required:
- reg
- reg-names
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sc7180-llcc
+ - qcom,sm6350-llcc
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: LLCC0 base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: llcc0_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sc7280-llcc
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: LLCC0 base register region
+ - description: LLCC1 base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: llcc0_base
+ - const: llcc1_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sc8180x-llcc
+ - qcom,sc8280xp-llcc
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: LLCC0 base register region
+ - description: LLCC1 base register region
+ - description: LLCC2 base register region
+ - description: LLCC3 base register region
+ - description: LLCC4 base register region
+ - description: LLCC5 base register region
+ - description: LLCC6 base register region
+ - description: LLCC7 base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: llcc0_base
+ - const: llcc1_base
+ - const: llcc2_base
+ - const: llcc3_base
+ - const: llcc4_base
+ - const: llcc5_base
+ - const: llcc6_base
+ - const: llcc7_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - qcom,sdm845-llcc
+ - qcom,sm8150-llcc
+ - qcom,sm8250-llcc
+ - qcom,sm8350-llcc
+ - qcom,sm8450-llcc
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: LLCC0 base register region
+ - description: LLCC1 base register region
+ - description: LLCC2 base register region
+ - description: LLCC3 base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: llcc0_base
+ - const: llcc1_base
+ - const: llcc2_base
+ - const: llcc3_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
- system-cache-controller@1100000 {
- compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc";
- reg = <0x1100000 0x200000>, <0x1300000 0x50000> ;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
- interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ system-cache-controller@1100000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc";
+ reg = <0 0x01100000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x01180000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x01200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x01280000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x01300000 0 0x50000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ };
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
On SDM845, the size of the LLCC bank 0 needs to be reduced to 0x4500 as
there are LLCC BWMON registers located after this range.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
index 479859bd8ab3..3bf95a12ebb9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
@@ -2192,8 +2192,11 @@ uart15: serial@a9c000 {
llcc: system-cache-controller@1100000 {
compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x01100000 0 0x31000>, <0 0x01300000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x01100000 0 0x45000>, <0 0x01180000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x01200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x01280000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x01300000 0 0x50000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
On SC7180, there is only one LLCC bank available. So let's just pass that
as "llcc0_base".
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
index ebfa21e9ed8a..62cc9eb4882d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
@@ -2760,7 +2760,7 @@ dc_noc: interconnect@9160000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sc7180-llcc";
reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
While at it, let's also fix the size of the llcc_broadcast_base to cover
the whole region.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index bdcb74925313..afe74db1f5ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -3582,8 +3582,9 @@ gem_noc: interconnect@9100000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sc7280-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0xd0000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09600000 0 0x58000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]> # Thinkpad X13s
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <[email protected]> # sa8540p-ride
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
index 0d02599d8867..f5262ac64a36 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
@@ -2983,8 +2983,14 @@ opp-6 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x58000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09300000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09380000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09400000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09480000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09500000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09580000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09600000 0 0x58000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc4_base", "llcc5_base",
+ "llcc6_base", "llcc7_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
index fd20096cfc6e..e316a4e4b5aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
@@ -1772,8 +1772,11 @@ mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm8150-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x200000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x09300000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09380000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
index 2f0e460acccd..a13cf98b1ac3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
@@ -3559,8 +3559,11 @@ usb_1_dwc3: usb@a600000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm8250-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x1d0000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x09300000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09380000 0 0x50000>,
+ <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
};
usb_2: usb@a8f8800 {
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
index 1c97e28da6ad..3fefd8cbba6d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350.dtsi
@@ -2204,8 +2204,11 @@ gem_noc: interconnect@9100000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm8350-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x1d0000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09300000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09380000 0 0x58000>,
+ <0 0x09600000 0 0x58000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
};
compute_noc: interconnect@a0c0000 {
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index 1a744a33bcf4..636dc6823d4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -3981,8 +3981,11 @@ gem_noc: interconnect@19100000 {
system-cache-controller@19200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm8450-llcc";
- reg = <0 0x19200000 0 0x580000>, <0 0x19a00000 0 0x80000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg = <0 0x19200000 0 0x80000>, <0 0x19600000 0 0x80000>,
+ <0 0x19300000 0 0x80000>, <0 0x19700000 0 0x80000>,
+ <0 0x19a00000 0 0x80000>;
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc2_base",
+ "llcc3_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 266 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
--
2.25.1
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
On SM6350, there is only one LLCC bank available. So let's just pass that
as "llcc0_base".
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
index 1e1d366c92c1..63e55579e9c4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ dc_noc: interconnect@9160000 {
system-cache-controller@9200000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm6350-llcc";
reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x50000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>;
- reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
+ reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc_broadcast_base";
};
gem_noc: interconnect@9680000 {
--
2.25.1
The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for
accessing the (Control and Status Registers) CSRs of each LLCC bank.
This stride only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver
support was initially added.
But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the
banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register
stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a
crash.
For fixing this issue, let's obtain the base address of each LLCC bank from
devicetree and get rid of the fixed stride. This also means, there is no
need to rely on reg-names property and the base addresses can be obtained
using the index.
First index is LLCC bank 0 and last index is LLCC broadcast. If the SoC
supports more than one bank, then those need to be defined in devicetree
for index from 1..N-1.
Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]> # Thinkpad X13s
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <[email protected]> # sa8540p-ride
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 14 +++---
drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------
include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h | 6 +--
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
index 3256254c3722..1d3cc1930a74 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
for (i = 0; i < reg_data.reg_cnt; i++) {
synd_reg = reg_data.synd_reg + (i * 4);
- ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap, drv->offsets[bank] + synd_reg,
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], synd_reg,
&synd_val);
if (ret)
goto clear;
@@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
reg_data.name, i, synd_val);
}
- ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
- drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.count_status_reg,
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], reg_data.count_status_reg,
&err_cnt);
if (ret)
goto clear;
@@ -233,8 +232,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: Error count: 0x%4x\n",
reg_data.name, err_cnt);
- ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
- drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.ways_status_reg,
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], reg_data.ways_status_reg,
&err_ways);
if (ret)
goto clear;
@@ -296,8 +294,7 @@ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
/* Iterate over the banks and look for Tag RAM or Data RAM errors */
for (i = 0; i < drv->num_banks; i++) {
- ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
- drv->offsets[i] + DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
&drp_error);
if (!ret && (drp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR)) {
@@ -312,8 +309,7 @@ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
if (!ret)
irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
- ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
- drv->offsets[i] + TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS,
+ ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS,
&trp_error);
if (!ret && (trp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR)) {
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
index 23ce2f78c4ed..72f3f2a9aaa0 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
@@ -62,8 +62,6 @@
#define LLCC_TRP_WRSC_CACHEABLE_EN 0x21f2c
#define LLCC_TRP_ALGO_CFG8 0x21f30
-#define BANK_OFFSET_STRIDE 0x80000
-
#define LLCC_VERSION_2_0_0_0 0x02000000
#define LLCC_VERSION_2_1_0_0 0x02010000
#define LLCC_VERSION_4_1_0_0 0x04010000
@@ -898,8 +896,8 @@ static int qcom_llcc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
- const char *name)
+static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 index,
+ const char *name)
{
void __iomem *base;
struct regmap_config llcc_regmap_config = {
@@ -909,7 +907,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
.fast_io = true,
};
- base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, name);
+ base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, index);
if (IS_ERR(base))
return ERR_CAST(base);
@@ -927,6 +925,7 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
const struct llcc_slice_config *llcc_cfg;
u32 sz;
u32 version;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
drv_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!drv_data) {
@@ -934,21 +933,51 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
- drv_data->regmap = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, "llcc_base");
- if (IS_ERR(drv_data->regmap)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->regmap);
+ /* Initialize the first LLCC bank regmap */
+ regmap = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, 0, "llcc0_base");
+ if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
goto err;
}
- drv_data->bcast_regmap =
- qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, "llcc_broadcast_base");
+ cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+
+ ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err;
+
+ num_banks &= LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK;
+ num_banks >>= LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT;
+ drv_data->num_banks = num_banks;
+
+ drv_data->regmaps = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_banks, sizeof(*drv_data->regmaps), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!drv_data->regmaps) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ drv_data->regmaps[0] = regmap;
+
+ /* Initialize rest of LLCC bank regmaps */
+ for (i = 1; i < num_banks; i++) {
+ char *base = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "llcc%d_base", i);
+
+ drv_data->regmaps[i] = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, i, base);
+ if (IS_ERR(drv_data->regmaps[i])) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->regmaps[i]);
+ kfree(base);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ kfree(base);
+ }
+
+ drv_data->bcast_regmap = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, i, "llcc_broadcast_base");
if (IS_ERR(drv_data->bcast_regmap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->bcast_regmap);
goto err;
}
- cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
-
/* Extract version of the IP */
ret = regmap_read(drv_data->bcast_regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_HW_INFO],
&version);
@@ -957,15 +986,6 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
drv_data->version = version;
- ret = regmap_read(drv_data->regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0],
- &num_banks);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
- num_banks &= LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK;
- num_banks >>= LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT;
- drv_data->num_banks = num_banks;
-
llcc_cfg = cfg->sct_data;
sz = cfg->size;
@@ -973,16 +993,6 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (llcc_cfg[i].slice_id > drv_data->max_slices)
drv_data->max_slices = llcc_cfg[i].slice_id;
- drv_data->offsets = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_banks, sizeof(u32),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!drv_data->offsets) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err;
- }
-
- for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++)
- drv_data->offsets[i] = i * BANK_OFFSET_STRIDE;
-
drv_data->bitmap = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, drv_data->max_slices,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!drv_data->bitmap) {
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
index ad1fd718169d..423220e66026 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ struct llcc_edac_reg_offset {
/**
* struct llcc_drv_data - Data associated with the llcc driver
- * @regmap: regmap associated with the llcc device
+ * @regmaps: regmaps associated with the llcc device
* @bcast_regmap: regmap associated with llcc broadcast offset
* @cfg: pointer to the data structure for slice configuration
* @edac_reg_offset: Offset of the LLCC EDAC registers
@@ -129,12 +129,11 @@ struct llcc_edac_reg_offset {
* @max_slices: max slices as read from device tree
* @num_banks: Number of llcc banks
* @bitmap: Bit map to track the active slice ids
- * @offsets: Pointer to the bank offsets array
* @ecc_irq: interrupt for llcc cache error detection and reporting
* @version: Indicates the LLCC version
*/
struct llcc_drv_data {
- struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct regmap **regmaps;
struct regmap *bcast_regmap;
const struct llcc_slice_config *cfg;
const struct llcc_edac_reg_offset *edac_reg_offset;
@@ -143,7 +142,6 @@ struct llcc_drv_data {
u32 max_slices;
u32 num_banks;
unsigned long *bitmap;
- u32 *offsets;
int ecc_irq;
u32 version;
};
--
2.25.1
Not all Qcom platforms support IRQ mode for ECC handling. For those
platforms, the current EDAC driver will not be probed due to missing ECC
IRQ in devicetree.
So add support for polling mode so that the EDAC driver can be used on all
Qcom platforms supporting LLCC.
The polling delay of 5000ms is chosen based on Qcom downstream/vendor
driver.
Reported-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]> # Thinkpad X13s
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <[email protected]> # sa8540p-ride
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 13 +++++-----
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
index 1d3cc1930a74..265e0fb39bc7 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@
#define DRP0_INTERRUPT_ENABLE BIT(6)
#define SB_DB_DRP_INTERRUPT_ENABLE 0x3
+#define ECC_POLL_MSEC 5000
+
enum {
LLCC_DRAM_CE = 0,
LLCC_DRAM_UE,
@@ -283,8 +285,7 @@ dump_syn_reg(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl, int err_type, u32 bank)
return ret;
}
-static irqreturn_t
-llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
+static irqreturn_t llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
{
struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev_ctl = edev_ctl;
struct llcc_drv_data *drv = edac_dev_ctl->dev->platform_data;
@@ -328,6 +329,11 @@ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
return irq_rc;
}
+static void llcc_ecc_check(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edev_ctl)
+{
+ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(0, edev_ctl);
+}
+
static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct llcc_drv_data *llcc_driv_data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
@@ -355,29 +361,31 @@ static int qcom_llcc_edac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
edev_ctl->ctl_name = "llcc";
edev_ctl->panic_on_ue = LLCC_ERP_PANIC_ON_UE;
- rc = edac_device_add_device(edev_ctl);
- if (rc)
- goto out_mem;
-
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edev_ctl);
-
- /* Request for ecc irq */
+ /* Check if LLCC driver has passed ECC IRQ */
ecc_irq = llcc_driv_data->ecc_irq;
- if (ecc_irq < 0) {
- rc = -ENODEV;
- goto out_dev;
- }
- rc = devm_request_irq(dev, ecc_irq, llcc_ecc_irq_handler,
+ if (ecc_irq > 0) {
+ /* Use interrupt mode if IRQ is available */
+ rc = devm_request_irq(dev, ecc_irq, llcc_ecc_irq_handler,
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "llcc_ecc", edev_ctl);
- if (rc)
- goto out_dev;
+ if (!rc) {
+ edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_INT;
+ goto irq_done;
+ }
+ }
- return rc;
+ /* Fall back to polling mode otherwise */
+ edev_ctl->poll_msec = ECC_POLL_MSEC;
+ edev_ctl->edac_check = llcc_ecc_check;
+ edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_POLL;
-out_dev:
- edac_device_del_device(edev_ctl->dev);
-out_mem:
- edac_device_free_ctl_info(edev_ctl);
+irq_done:
+ rc = edac_device_add_device(edev_ctl);
+ if (rc) {
+ edac_device_free_ctl_info(edev_ctl);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, edev_ctl);
return rc;
}
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
index 72f3f2a9aaa0..7b7c5a38bac6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
@@ -1011,13 +1011,12 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
drv_data->ecc_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
- if (drv_data->ecc_irq >= 0) {
- llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
- "qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
- sizeof(*drv_data));
- if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
- }
+
+ llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
+ "qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
+ sizeof(*drv_data));
+ if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
return 0;
err:
--
2.25.1
The platforms based on SDM845 SoC locks the access to EDAC registers in the
bootloader. So probing the EDAC driver will result in a crash. Hence,
disable the creation of EDAC platform device on all SDM845 devices.
The issue has been observed on Lenovo Yoga C630 and DB845c.
While at it, also sort the members of `struct qcom_llcc_config` to avoid
any holes in-between.
Cc: <[email protected]> # 5.10
Reported-by: Steev Klimaszewski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
index 7b7c5a38bac6..a5140f19f200 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
@@ -120,10 +120,11 @@ struct llcc_slice_config {
struct qcom_llcc_config {
const struct llcc_slice_config *sct_data;
- int size;
- bool need_llcc_cfg;
const u32 *reg_offset;
const struct llcc_edac_reg_offset *edac_reg_offset;
+ int size;
+ bool need_llcc_cfg;
+ bool no_edac;
};
enum llcc_reg_offset {
@@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static const struct qcom_llcc_config sdm845_cfg = {
.need_llcc_cfg = false,
.reg_offset = llcc_v1_reg_offset,
.edac_reg_offset = &llcc_v1_edac_reg_offset,
+ .no_edac = true,
};
static const struct qcom_llcc_config sm6350_cfg = {
@@ -1012,11 +1014,19 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
drv_data->ecc_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
- llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
- "qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
- sizeof(*drv_data));
- if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
+ /*
+ * On some platforms, the access to EDAC registers will be locked by
+ * the bootloader. So probing the EDAC driver will result in a crash.
+ * Hence, disable the creation of EDAC platform device for the
+ * problematic platforms.
+ */
+ if (!cfg->no_edac) {
+ llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
+ "qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
+ sizeof(*drv_data));
+ if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
+ }
return 0;
err:
--
2.25.1
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:34:29 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for
> accessing the (Control and Status Regsiters) CSRs of each LLCC bank.
> This offset only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver support
> was initially added.
>
> But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the
> banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register
> stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a
> crash with the current drivers. So far this crash is not reported since
> EDAC_QCOM driver is not enabled in ARM64 defconfig and no one tested the
> driver extensively by triggering the EDAC IRQ (that's where each bank
> CSRs are accessed).
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[03/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: bfe088bde391824040c39cbf277d7fe782042936
[04/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 116a932bbc7bc740b068fbfe320a465811ca62f8
[05/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 62e5ee9db98ed67eb50205072135544055cba9c4
[06/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 0fe0955a79b994b8dcabe79f3a7192251fb256ea
[07/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: c5ccf8d33f11f57ef46d12db1dda4afcc4d5150b
[08/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 42c9b1578233eeb3044656a446486bd2efc87312
[09/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 7ae317cba6be783cfd6155bceec91d0918f78fb8
[10/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 413c8ecd48f1df8034c7b13881ded33b3d10171f
[11/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks
commit: 65d9975e5dae4601e8902765d08f55c246fd2022
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
On 14/03/2023 09:04, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Both Rishabh and Sai have left Qualcomm, and there is no evidence of them
> maintaining with a new identity. So their entry needs to be removed.
>
> Listed Bjorn as the interim maintainer until someone volunteers to maintain
> this binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> ---
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Krzysztof