This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
return to af_vsock.c.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
---
Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Changelog:
v1 -> v2:
- If sent something, return number of bytes sent (even in
case of error). Return error only if failed to sent first
skbuff.
v2 -> v3:
- Handle case when transport callback returns unexpected value which
is not equal to 'skb->len'. Break loop.
- Don't check for zero value of 'rest_len' before calling
'virtio_transport_put_credit()'. Decided to add this check directly
to 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' in separate patch.
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 6564192e7f20..e0b2c6ecbe22 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
+ u32 rest_len;
+ int ret;
info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
@@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
vvs = vsk->trans;
- /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
- if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
- pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
-
/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
@@ -227,17 +224,51 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
return pkt_len;
- skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
- src_cid, src_port,
- dst_cid, dst_port);
- if (!skb) {
- virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ ret = 0;
+ rest_len = pkt_len;
+
+ do {
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ size_t skb_len;
+
+ skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
+
+ skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
+ src_cid, src_port,
+ dst_cid, dst_port);
+ if (!skb) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
- virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
- return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+
+ /* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
+ * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
+ * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
+ * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
+ * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
+ */
+ rest_len -= ret;
+
+ if (ret != skb_len) {
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+ } while (rest_len);
+
+ virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
+
+ /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
+ if (rest_len != pkt_len)
+ ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
+
+ return ret;
}
static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
--
2.25.1
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:31:48AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
>skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
>credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
>return to af_vsock.c.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>---
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
> Link to v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
>
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> - If sent something, return number of bytes sent (even in
> case of error). Return error only if failed to sent first
> skbuff.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Handle case when transport callback returns unexpected value which
> is not equal to 'skb->len'. Break loop.
> - Don't check for zero value of 'rest_len' before calling
> 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'. Decided to add this check directly
> to 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' in separate patch.
>
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 6564192e7f20..e0b2c6ecbe22 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
> struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
> u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
>- struct sk_buff *skb;
>+ u32 rest_len;
>+ int ret;
>
> info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
>
>@@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>
> vvs = vsk->trans;
>
>- /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
>- if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
>- pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
>-
> /* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
> pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
>
>@@ -227,17 +224,51 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
> return pkt_len;
>
>- skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
>- src_cid, src_port,
>- dst_cid, dst_port);
>- if (!skb) {
>- virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
>- return -ENOMEM;
>- }
>+ ret = 0;
>+ rest_len = pkt_len;
>+
>+ do {
>+ struct sk_buff *skb;
>+ size_t skb_len;
>+
>+ skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
>+
>+ skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
>+ src_cid, src_port,
>+ dst_cid, dst_port);
>+ if (!skb) {
>+ ret = -ENOMEM;
>+ break;
>+ }
>+
>+ virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>
>- virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>+ ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
>
>- return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
>+ if (ret < 0)
>+ break;
>+
>+ /* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
>+ * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
>+ * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
>+ * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
>+ * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
>+ */
>+ rest_len -= ret;
>+
>+ if (ret != skb_len) {
>+ ret = -EFAULT;
Okay, but `ret` will be overwritten by the check we have before the
return ...
>+ break;
>+ }
>+ } while (rest_len);
>+
>+ virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
>+
>+ /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
>+ if (rest_len != pkt_len)
>+ ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
... here.
Since we don't expect this condition for now, perhaps we can avoid
setting ret with -EFAULT, but we can add a WARN_ONCE (interrupting the
loop as you did here).
This way we return the partial length as we did before.
Thanks,
Stefano
>+
>+ return ret;
> }
>
> static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
>--
>2.25.1
>
On 21.03.2023 11:40, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:31:48AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
>> skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
>> credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
>> return to af_vsock.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Link to v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
>> Link to v2:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
>>
>> Changelog:
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - If sent something, return number of bytes sent (even in
>> case of error). Return error only if failed to sent first
>> skbuff.
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - Handle case when transport callback returns unexpected value which
>> is not equal to 'skb->len'. Break loop.
>> - Don't check for zero value of 'rest_len' before calling
>> 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'. Decided to add this check directly
>> to 'virtio_transport_put_credit()' in separate patch.
>>
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> index 6564192e7f20..e0b2c6ecbe22 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
>> struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
>> u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
>> - struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + u32 rest_len;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
>>
>> @@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>>
>> vvs = vsk->trans;
>>
>> - /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
>> - if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
>> - pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
>> -
>> /* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
>> pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
>>
>> @@ -227,17 +224,51 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
>> return pkt_len;
>>
>> - skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
>> - src_cid, src_port,
>> - dst_cid, dst_port);
>> - if (!skb) {
>> - virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - }
>> + ret = 0;
>> + rest_len = pkt_len;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + size_t skb_len;
>> +
>> + skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
>> +
>> + skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
>> + src_cid, src_port,
>> + dst_cid, dst_port);
>> + if (!skb) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>>
>> - virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>> + ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
>>
>> - return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
>> + * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
>> + * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
>> + * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
>> + * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
>> + */
>> + rest_len -= ret;
>> +
>> + if (ret != skb_len) {
>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>
> Okay, but `ret` will be overwritten by the check we have before the
> return ...
>
Yes, you're right, this assignment has no effect, since 'rest_len' is already
changed and ret will be changed. I'll fix it.
Thanks, Arseniy
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + } while (rest_len);
>> +
>> + virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
>> +
>> + /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
>> + if (rest_len != pkt_len)
>> + ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
>
> ... here.
>
> Since we don't expect this condition for now, perhaps we can avoid
> setting ret with -EFAULT, but we can add a WARN_ONCE (interrupting the
> loop as you did here).
>
> This way we return the partial length as we did before.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>