It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
index 6afae9897843..34d755797db4 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/ti-sysc.c
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static int sysc_map_and_check_registers(struct sysc *ddata)
sysc_check_children(ddata);
- if (!of_get_property(np, "reg", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_present(np, "reg"))
return 0;
error = sysc_parse_registers(ddata);
--
2.39.2
* Rob Herring <[email protected]> [230310 16:48]:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
Thanks applying into omap-for-v6.4/ti-sysc.
Tony