Using a starting value of INT_MAX rather than 999999 or 99999 means
this algorithm won't fail should the numbers being compared ever
exceed this value.
Signed-off-by: Steve Wahl <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
index 6d2739eadb71..2da84befabf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static void __init decode_gam_rng_tbl(unsigned long ptr)
struct uv_gam_range_entry *gre = (struct uv_gam_range_entry *)ptr;
unsigned long lgre = 0, gend = 0;
int index = 0;
- int sock_min = 999999, pnode_min = 99999;
+ int sock_min = INT_MAX, pnode_min = INT_MAX;
int sock_max = -1, pnode_max = -1;
uv_gre_table = gre;
@@ -1694,7 +1694,7 @@ static void __init uv_system_init_hub(void)
{
struct uv_hub_info_s hub_info = {0};
int bytes, cpu, nodeid;
- unsigned short min_pnode = 9999, max_pnode = 0;
+ unsigned short min_pnode = USHRT_MAX, max_pnode = 0;
char *hub = is_uv5_hub() ? "UV500" :
is_uv4_hub() ? "UV400" :
is_uv3_hub() ? "UV300" :
--
2.26.2