Fix alignment to match opening parenthesis as suggested by Linux kernel
coding-style. This issue is reported by checkpatch.
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
index cde41111012a..d0b943145259 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
@@ -564,11 +564,9 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_tx_power_tracking_callback_tssi(struct net_device *dev)
for (k = 0; k < 5; k++) {
if (k != 4)
- tmp_report[k] = rtl92e_readb(dev,
- Tssi_Report_Value1+k);
+ tmp_report[k] = rtl92e_readb(dev, Tssi_Report_Value1+k);
else
- tmp_report[k] = rtl92e_readb(dev,
- Tssi_Report_Value2);
+ tmp_report[k] = rtl92e_readb(dev, Tssi_Report_Value2);
if (tmp_report[k] <= 20) {
viviflag = true;
@@ -1138,7 +1136,7 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_false_alarm(struct net_device *dev)
return;
if (priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb <= dm_digtable.rssi_low_thresh) {
if (dm_digtable.dig_state == DM_STA_DIG_OFF &&
- (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt))
+ (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt))
return;
reset_cnt = priv->reset_count;
@@ -1216,7 +1214,7 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_highpwr(struct net_device *dev)
if (priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb >=
dm_digtable.rssi_high_power_highthresh) {
if (dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state == DM_STA_DIG_ON &&
- (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt_highpwr))
+ (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt_highpwr))
return;
dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state = DM_STA_DIG_ON;
@@ -1226,7 +1224,7 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_highpwr(struct net_device *dev)
rtl92e_writeb(dev, rOFDM0_RxDetector1, 0x43);
} else {
if (dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state == DM_STA_DIG_OFF &&
- (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt_highpwr))
+ (priv->reset_count == reset_cnt_highpwr))
return;
dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state = DM_STA_DIG_OFF;
@@ -2111,9 +2109,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_fsync(struct net_device *dev)
} else if (priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb >=
(RegC38_TH+5)) {
if (reg_c38_State) {
- rtl92e_writeb(dev,
- rOFDM0_RxDetector3,
- priv->framesync);
+ rtl92e_writeb(dev, rOFDM0_RxDetector3,
+ priv->framesync);
reg_c38_State = RegC38_Default;
}
}
@@ -2129,14 +2126,14 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_fsync(struct net_device *dev)
if (priv->frame_sync_monitor) {
if (priv->reset_count != reset_cnt) {
rtl92e_writeb(dev, rOFDM0_RxDetector3,
- priv->framesync);
+ priv->framesync);
reg_c38_State = RegC38_Default;
reset_cnt = priv->reset_count;
}
} else {
if (reg_c38_State) {
rtl92e_writeb(dev, rOFDM0_RxDetector3,
- priv->framesync);
+ priv->framesync);
reg_c38_State = RegC38_Default;
}
}
--
2.25.1
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> Fix alignment to match opening parenthesis as suggested by Linux kernel
> coding-style. This issue is reported by checkpatch.
>
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
You have sent a lot of different patches for the same driver, with the
same subject line, but yet doing different things. I am totally
confused as to what is, and is not, the latest versions, so I am
dropping all of these from my review queue.
Please resend them all, as a numbered patch series, so that we have a
clue as to what to review here.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > Fix alignment to match opening parenthesis as suggested by Linux kernel
> > coding-style. This issue is reported by checkpatch.
> >
> > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> You have sent a lot of different patches for the same driver, with the
> same subject line, but yet doing different things. I am totally
> confused as to what is, and is not, the latest versions, so I am
> dropping all of these from my review queue.
>
> Please resend them all, as a numbered patch series, so that we have a
> clue as to what to review here.
>
Okay. Thank you.
Regards
Sumitra
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h