If devm_request_irq() fails, then we are directly return 'ret' without
clk_disable_unprepare(sfc->clk) and clk_disable_unprepare(sfc->hclk).
Fix this by changing direct return to a goto 'err_irq'.
Fixes: 0b89fc0a367e ("spi: rockchip-sfc: add rockchip serial flash controller")
Signed-off-by: Li Lanzhe <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>
---
The issue is found by static analysis and remains untested.
---
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
index bd87d3c92dd3..69347b6bf60c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip-sfc.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int rockchip_sfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to request irq\n");
- return ret;
+ goto err_irq;
}
ret = rockchip_sfc_init(sfc);
--
2.39.2
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 -0400, Li Lanzhe wrote:
> If devm_request_irq() fails, then we are directly return 'ret' without
> clk_disable_unprepare(sfc->clk) and clk_disable_unprepare(sfc->hclk).
>
> Fix this by changing direct return to a goto 'err_irq'.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: spi-rockchip: Fix missing unwind goto in rockchip_sfc_probe()
commit: 359f5b0d4e26b7a7bcc574d6148b31a17cefe47d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark