2023-05-11 09:17:42

by Aidan MacDonald

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] regmap-irq: Drop backward compatibility for inverted mask/unmask

All users must now specify .mask_unmask_non_inverted = true to
ensure they are using the expected semantics: 1s disable IRQs
in the mask registers, and enable IRQs in the unmask registers.

Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <[email protected]>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 44 ++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
index 95bf457204bf..330da5d6c8c3 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@ struct regmap_irq_chip_data {
int irq;
int wake_count;

- unsigned int mask_base;
- unsigned int unmask_base;
-
void *status_reg_buf;
unsigned int *main_status_buf;
unsigned int *status_buf;
@@ -118,8 +115,8 @@ static void regmap_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
d->mask_buf[i],
d->chip->irq_drv_data);

- if (d->mask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) {
- reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i);
+ if (d->chip->mask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) {
+ reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->chip->mask_base, i);
ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg,
d->mask_buf_def[i],
d->mask_buf[i]);
@@ -127,8 +124,8 @@ static void regmap_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
dev_err(d->map->dev, "Failed to sync masks in %x\n", reg);
}

- if (d->unmask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) {
- reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->unmask_base, i);
+ if (d->chip->unmask_base && !d->chip->handle_mask_sync) {
+ reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->chip->unmask_base, i);
ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg,
d->mask_buf_def[i], ~d->mask_buf[i]);
if (ret)
@@ -645,6 +642,9 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
if (chip->clear_on_unmask && (chip->ack_base || chip->use_ack))
return -EINVAL;

+ if (chip->mask_base && chip->unmask_base && !chip->mask_unmask_non_inverted)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
for (i = 0; i < chip->num_irqs; i++) {
if (chip->irqs[i].reg_offset % map->reg_stride)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -733,28 +733,6 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
d->chip = chip;
d->irq_base = irq_base;

- if (chip->mask_base && chip->unmask_base &&
- !chip->mask_unmask_non_inverted) {
- /*
- * Chips that specify both mask_base and unmask_base used to
- * get inverted mask behavior by default, with no way to ask
- * for the normal, non-inverted behavior. This "inverted by
- * default" behavior is deprecated, but we have to support it
- * until existing drivers have been fixed.
- *
- * Existing drivers should be updated by swapping mask_base
- * and unmask_base and setting mask_unmask_non_inverted=true.
- * New drivers should always set the flag.
- */
- dev_warn(map->dev, "mask_base and unmask_base are inverted, please fix it");
-
- d->mask_base = chip->unmask_base;
- d->unmask_base = chip->mask_base;
- } else {
- d->mask_base = chip->mask_base;
- d->unmask_base = chip->unmask_base;
- }
-
if (chip->irq_reg_stride)
d->irq_reg_stride = chip->irq_reg_stride;
else
@@ -791,8 +769,8 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
goto err_alloc;
}

- if (d->mask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) {
- reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->mask_base, i);
+ if (chip->mask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) {
+ reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, chip->mask_base, i);
ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg,
d->mask_buf_def[i],
d->mask_buf[i]);
@@ -803,8 +781,8 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
}
}

- if (d->unmask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) {
- reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, d->unmask_base, i);
+ if (chip->unmask_base && !chip->handle_mask_sync) {
+ reg = d->get_irq_reg(d, chip->unmask_base, i);
ret = regmap_update_bits(d->map, reg,
d->mask_buf_def[i], ~d->mask_buf[i]);
if (ret) {
--
2.39.2