Add the missing kernel documentation to silence the build warning.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
---
New since v1 of the series, but might as well fix this build warning
too.
Thanks,
Charles
drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
index 26e6633693196..de8fe3c5becbb 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@
* @regs: Virtual address of the SPI controller registers
* @ref_clk: Pointer to the peripheral clock
* @pclk: Pointer to the APB clock
+ * @clk_rate: Reference clock frequency, taken from @ref_clk
* @speed_hz: Current SPI bus clock speed in Hz
* @txbuf: Pointer to the TX buffer
* @rxbuf: Pointer to the RX buffer
--
2.30.2
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Add the missing kernel documentation to silence the build warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> New since v1 of the series, but might as well fix this build warning
> too.
Sending this without the "v2" breaks threading and makes it hard to
handle with tooling, versioning applies to the patch series, not to
individual patches.
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Add the missing kernel documentation to silence the build warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > New since v1 of the series, but might as well fix this build warning
> > too.
>
> Sending this without the "v2" breaks threading and makes it hard to
> handle with tooling, versioning applies to the patch series, not to
> individual patches.
Apologies do you want me to resend?
Thanks,
Charles
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 02:21:06PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:52:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Sending this without the "v2" breaks threading and makes it hard to
> > handle with tooling, versioning applies to the patch series, not to
> > individual patches.
> Apologies do you want me to resend?
Just this patch please, the first patch is still going through CI but I
didn't figure out how to push this into the tooling.