commit f168420 ("blk-mq: don't redirect completion for hctx withs only
one ctx mapping") When nvme applies a 1:1 mapping of hctx and ctx, there
will be no remote request.
But for ufs, the submission and completion queues could be asymmetric.
(e.g. Multiple SQs share one CQ) Therefore, 1:1 mapping of hctx and
ctx won't complete request on the submission cpu. In this situation,
this nr_ctx check could violate the QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, as a result,
check on cpu id when there is only one ctx mapping.
Signed-off-by: Ed Tsai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Po-Wen Kao <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 41f7e2b500bd..ecc30ebe9483 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1176,7 +1176,8 @@ bool blk_mq_complete_request_remote(struct request *rq)
* or a polled request, always complete locally,
* it's pointless to redirect the completion.
*/
- if (rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 ||
+ if ((rq->mq_hctx->nr_ctx == 1 &&
+ rq->mq_ctx->cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) ||
rq->cmd_flags & REQ_POLLED)
return false;
--
2.18.0
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ed Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> commit f168420 ("blk-mq: don't redirect completion for hctx withs only
> one ctx mapping") When nvme applies a 1:1 mapping of hctx and ctx, there
> will be no remote request.
>
> But for ufs, the submission and completion queues could be asymmetric.
> (e.g. Multiple SQs share one CQ) Therefore, 1:1 mapping of hctx and
> ctx won't complete request on the submission cpu. In this situation,
> this nr_ctx check could violate the QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, as a result,
> check on cpu id when there is only one ctx mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Tsai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Po-Wen Kao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <[email protected]>
On 5/31/23 01:38, Ed Tsai wrote:
> commit f168420 ("blk-mq: don't redirect completion for hctx withs only
> one ctx mapping") When nvme applies a 1:1 mapping of hctx and ctx, there
> will be no remote request.
The above sentence is incomprehensible. Please make it comprehensible.
> Signed-off-by: Ed Tsai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Po-Wen Kao <[email protected]>
This patch comes from Keith Busch. Why has his name not been mentioned?
See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/[email protected]/.
Bart.