Has anyone received this message? I guess at least vger and [email protected]
rejected it, because I got this bounce email:
kernel.org suspects your message is spam and rejected it.
Error:
550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 554 5.7.1
Service unavailable; Helo command [EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com]
blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver;
https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/34.216.226.155
Message rejected by: smtp.kernel.org
Interestingly, if I click the link above, it says "This is not due to an
issue with your email set-up", so I'm not sure what to believe...
----- Forwarded message from Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> -----
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:39:23 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>, Eric Dumazet
<[email protected]>, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Paolo Abeni
<[email protected]>, Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>, Cong Wang
<[email protected]>, Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>, Vinicius Costa
Gomes <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli
<[email protected]>, Peilin Ye <[email protected]>,
Pedro Tammela <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with
its children
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc
dereferences in taprio:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely
commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see
the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs"").
This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the
title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a
non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats.
Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different
form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic).
Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be
appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems.
I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too
invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already.
Vladimir Oltean (5):
net/sched: taprio: don't access q->qdiscs[] in unoffloaded mode during
attach()
net/sched: taprio: keep child Qdisc refcount elevated at 2 in offload
mode
net/sched: taprio: try again to report q->qdiscs[] to qdisc_leaf()
net/sched: taprio: delete misleading comment about preallocating child
qdiscs
net/sched: taprio: dump class stats for the actual q->qdiscs[]
net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
----- End forwarded message -----
[Cc: [email protected]]
Dear Vladimir,
I have not seen this message. Maybe the postmasters know more.
Kind regards,
Paul
Am 31.05.23 um 20:33 schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> Has anyone received this message? I guess at least vger and [email protected]
> rejected it, because I got this bounce email:
>
> kernel.org suspects your message is spam and rejected it.
>
> Error:
> 550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 554 5.7.1
> Service unavailable; Helo command [EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com]
> blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver;
> https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/34.216.226.155
>
> Message rejected by: smtp.kernel.org
>
> Interestingly, if I click the link above, it says "This is not due to an
> issue with your email set-up", so I'm not sure what to believe...
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> -----
>
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:39:23 +0300
> From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>, Eric Dumazet
> <[email protected]>, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Paolo Abeni
> <[email protected]>, Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>, Cong Wang
> <[email protected]>, Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>, Vinicius Costa
> Gomes <[email protected]>, [email protected],
> [email protected], Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli
> <[email protected]>, Peilin Ye <[email protected]>,
> Pedro Tammela <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with
> its children
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc
> dereferences in taprio:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
>
> I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely
> commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see
> the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs"").
>
> This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the
> title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a
> non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats.
> Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different
> form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic).
>
> Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be
> appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems.
> I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too
> invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already.
>
> Vladimir Oltean (5):
> net/sched: taprio: don't access q->qdiscs[] in unoffloaded mode during
> attach()
> net/sched: taprio: keep child Qdisc refcount elevated at 2 in offload
> mode
> net/sched: taprio: try again to report q->qdiscs[] to qdisc_leaf()
> net/sched: taprio: delete misleading comment about preallocating child
> qdiscs
> net/sched: taprio: dump class stats for the actual q->qdiscs[]
>
> net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>