When referring to array of phandles, using <> to separate the array
entries is better notation as it makes potential errors with phandle and
cell arguments easier to catch. Fix the outliers to be consistent with
the rest of the usage.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
index 91bdc6026d1f..fef68a778ac9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
@@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ &usb0 {
&cpsw3g {
pinctrl-names = "default";
- pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default
- &rgmii2_pins_default>;
+ pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default>,
+ <&rgmii2_pins_default>;
};
&cpsw_port1 {
@@ -560,25 +560,25 @@ &mailbox0_cluster7 {
};
&main_r5fss0_core0 {
- mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core0>;
+ mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2>, <&mbox_main_r5fss0_core0>;
memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
<&main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
};
&main_r5fss0_core1 {
- mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core1>;
+ mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2>, <&mbox_main_r5fss0_core1>;
memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core1_dma_memory_region>,
<&main_r5fss0_core1_memory_region>;
};
&main_r5fss1_core0 {
- mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core0>;
+ mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4>, <&mbox_main_r5fss1_core0>;
memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core0_dma_memory_region>,
<&main_r5fss1_core0_memory_region>;
};
&main_r5fss1_core1 {
- mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4 &mbox_main_r5fss1_core1>;
+ mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster4>, <&mbox_main_r5fss1_core1>;
memory-region = <&main_r5fss1_core1_dma_memory_region>,
<&main_r5fss1_core1_memory_region>;
};
--
2.40.0
Hi Nishanth
On 6/1/2023 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> When referring to array of phandles, using <> to separate the array
> entries is better notation as it makes potential errors with phandle and
> cell arguments easier to catch. Fix the outliers to be consistent with
> the rest of the usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> index 91bdc6026d1f..fef68a778ac9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> @@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ &usb0 {
>
> &cpsw3g {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default
> - &rgmii2_pins_default>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default>,
> + <&rgmii2_pins_default>;
Please see, if pinctrl-0 can be defined in one line, instead of two, to
be inline with most of changes in this series.
> [..]
On 22:32-20230605, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> Hi Nishanth
>
> On 6/1/2023 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > When referring to array of phandles, using <> to separate the array
> > entries is better notation as it makes potential errors with phandle and
> > cell arguments easier to catch. Fix the outliers to be consistent with
> > the rest of the usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> > index 91bdc6026d1f..fef68a778ac9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
> > @@ -467,8 +467,8 @@ &usb0 {
> > &cpsw3g {
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > - pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default
> > - &rgmii2_pins_default>;
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default>,
> > + <&rgmii2_pins_default>;
>
>
> Please see, if? pinctrl-0 can be defined in one line, instead of two, to be
> inline with most of changes in this series.
OK. I think i can respin it with that style change included once other
comments flow in.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D