We changed the semantics for this in:
e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_remove_payload()")
But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
index 5bb777ff13130..1637e08b548c2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
@@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev);
struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
- struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
+ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state;
+ struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload;
NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name);
+ old_mst_state = drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
+
payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port);
+ old_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->port);
// TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here?
if (msto->disabled) {
- drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
+ drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload);
nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0);
} else {
--
2.40.1
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:05 PM Lyude Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We changed the semantics for this in:
>
> e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_remove_payload()")
>
> But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> index 5bb777ff13130..1637e08b548c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> @@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev);
> struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
> struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
> - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state;
> + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload;
>
> NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name);
>
> + old_mst_state = drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
> +
> payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port);
> + old_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->port);
>
> // TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here?
> if (msto->disabled) {
> - drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
> + drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload);
>
> nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> } else {
> --
> 2.40.1
>