2023-06-27 15:07:50

by Julia Lawall

Subject: [PATCH v2 05/24] RDMA/erdma: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc

Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc to protect against
multiplication overflows.

The changes were done using the following Coccinelle
semantic patch:

// <smpl>
@initialize:ocaml@
@@

let rename alloc =
match alloc with
"vmalloc" -> "vmalloc_array"
| "vzalloc" -> "vcalloc"
| _ -> failwith "unknown"

@@
size_t e1,e2;
constant C1, C2;
expression E1, E2, COUNT, x1, x2, x3;
typedef u8;
typedef __u8;
type t = {u8,__u8,char,unsigned char};
identifier alloc = {vmalloc,vzalloc};
fresh identifier realloc = script:ocaml(alloc) { rename alloc };
@@

(
alloc(x1*x2*x3)
|
alloc(C1 * C2)
|
alloc((sizeof(t)) * (COUNT), ...)
|
- alloc((e1) * (e2))
+ realloc(e1, e2)
|
- alloc((e1) * (COUNT))
+ realloc(COUNT, e1)
|
- alloc((E1) * (E2))
+ realloc(E1, E2)
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

---
v2: Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc instead of array_size.
This also leaves a multiplication of a constant by a sizeof
as is. Two patches are thus dropped from the series.

drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -u -p a/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c
@@ -481,8 +481,8 @@ static int init_kernel_qp(struct erdma_d
dev->func_bar + (ERDMA_SDB_SHARED_PAGE_INDEX << PAGE_SHIFT);
kqp->hw_rq_db = dev->func_bar + ERDMA_BAR_RQDB_SPACE_OFFSET;

- kqp->swr_tbl = vmalloc(qp->attrs.sq_size * sizeof(u64));
- kqp->rwr_tbl = vmalloc(qp->attrs.rq_size * sizeof(u64));
+ kqp->swr_tbl = vmalloc_array(qp->attrs.sq_size, sizeof(u64));
+ kqp->rwr_tbl = vmalloc_array(qp->attrs.rq_size, sizeof(u64));
if (!kqp->swr_tbl || !kqp->rwr_tbl)
goto err_out;

2023-07-21 20:01:03

by Jason Gunthorpe

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/24] RDMA/erdma: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 04:43:20PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc to protect against
> multiplication overflows.
>
> The changes were done using the following Coccinelle
> semantic patch:
>
> // <smpl>
> @initialize:ocaml@
> @@
>
> let rename alloc =
> match alloc with
> "vmalloc" -> "vmalloc_array"
> | "vzalloc" -> "vcalloc"
> | _ -> failwith "unknown"
>
> @@
> size_t e1,e2;
> constant C1, C2;
> expression E1, E2, COUNT, x1, x2, x3;
> typedef u8;
> typedef __u8;
> type t = {u8,__u8,char,unsigned char};
> identifier alloc = {vmalloc,vzalloc};
> fresh identifier realloc = script:ocaml(alloc) { rename alloc };
> @@
>
> (
> alloc(x1*x2*x3)
> |
> alloc(C1 * C2)
> |
> alloc((sizeof(t)) * (COUNT), ...)
> |
> - alloc((e1) * (e2))
> + realloc(e1, e2)
> |
> - alloc((e1) * (COUNT))
> + realloc(COUNT, e1)
> |
> - alloc((E1) * (E2))
> + realloc(E1, E2)
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc instead of array_size.
> This also leaves a multiplication of a constant by a sizeof
> as is. Two patches are thus dropped from the series.
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_verbs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied to rdma for-next along with

[v2,19/24] RDMA/bnxt_re: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc
[v2,14/24] RDMA/siw: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc
[v2,05/24] RDMA/erdma: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc

Thanks,
Jason