The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c | 2 +-
drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c | 3 ++-
drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.h | 1 -
drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c | 2 +-
drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c | 2 +-
drivers/sbus/char/flash.c | 2 +-
drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c
index 4f2dd21e44a0..23af4edd295b 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
#include "bbc_i2c.h"
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c
index 537e55cd038d..1c76e27d527a 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <asm/bbc.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.h b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.h
index c2d066d3fa41..7ffe908c62dc 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.h
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.h
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
#define _BBC_I2C_H
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
struct bbc_i2c_client {
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c b/drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c
index 5368b6ba2884..18e6f84e754f 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/display7seg.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h> /* put_/get_user */
#include <asm/io.h>
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c
index ea914a7eaa7f..3dd7274cb0a3 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/envctrl.h>
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/flash.c b/drivers/sbus/char/flash.c
index 3adfef210d8e..ea2d903ba673 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/flash.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/flash.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
diff --git a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
index 05de0ce79cb9..0660425e3a5a 100644
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/uctrl.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <asm/openprom.h>
#include <asm/oplib.h>
--
2.40.1
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:50:48AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> explicitly include the correct includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>