A new diagnostic in clang-17 now produces the following build error:
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:41:3: error: cannot jump from this
indirect goto statement to one of its possible targets
41 | drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
| ^
include/drm/drm_exec.h:96:4: note: expanded from macro
'drm_exec_retry_on_contention'
96 | goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr;
| ^
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: possible target of
indirect goto statement
39 | drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
| ^
include/drm/drm_exec.h:79:33: note: expanded from macro
'drm_exec_until_all_locked'
79 | __label__ __drm_exec_retry;
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: jump enters a
statement expression
The GCC manually currently states that:
>> Jumping into a statement expression with a computed goto (see Labels
>> as Values) has undefined behavior.
So the diagnostic appears correct, even if codegen happened to produce
working code.
Looking closer at this code, while the original combination of statement
expression, local label, and computed/indirect goto GNU C expressions
were clever, a simple while loop and continue block might have sufficed.
This approach might not work as expected if drm_exec_until_all_locked
"loops" can be nested, but that doesn't appear to be an existing use
case in the codebase.
Fixes: commit 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7")
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
---
include/drm/drm_exec.h | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
index 73205afec162..393ac022ed3a 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
@@ -70,18 +70,9 @@ struct drm_exec {
* Core functionality of the drm_exec object. Loops until all GEM objects are
* locked and no more contention exists. At the beginning of the loop it is
* guaranteed that no GEM object is locked.
- *
- * Since labels can't be defined local to the loops body we use a jump pointer
- * to make sure that the retry is only used from within the loops body.
*/
#define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) \
- for (void *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; ({ \
- __label__ __drm_exec_retry; \
-__drm_exec_retry: \
- __drm_exec_retry_ptr = &&__drm_exec_retry; \
- (void)__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
- drm_exec_cleanup(exec); \
- });)
+ while(drm_exec_cleanup(exec))
/**
* drm_exec_retry_on_contention - restart the loop to grap all locks
@@ -93,7 +84,7 @@ __drm_exec_retry: \
#define drm_exec_retry_on_contention(exec) \
do { \
if (unlikely(drm_exec_is_contended(exec))) \
- goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
+ continue; \
} while (0)
/**
---
base-commit: 451cc82bd11eb6a374f4dbcfc1cf007eafea91ab
change-id: 20230727-amdgpu-93c0e5302951
Best regards,
--
Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 3:47 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A new diagnostic in clang-17 now produces the following build error:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:41:3: error: cannot jump from this
> indirect goto statement to one of its possible targets
> 41 | drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
> | ^
> include/drm/drm_exec.h:96:4: note: expanded from macro
> 'drm_exec_retry_on_contention'
> 96 | goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr;
> | ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: possible target of
> indirect goto statement
> 39 | drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
> | ^
> include/drm/drm_exec.h:79:33: note: expanded from macro
> 'drm_exec_until_all_locked'
> 79 | __label__ __drm_exec_retry;
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: jump enters a
> statement expression
>
> The GCC manually currently states that:
> >> Jumping into a statement expression with a computed goto (see Labels
> >> as Values) has undefined behavior.
>
> So the diagnostic appears correct, even if codegen happened to produce
> working code.
>
> Looking closer at this code, while the original combination of statement
> expression, local label, and computed/indirect goto GNU C expressions
> were clever, a simple while loop and continue block might have sufficed.
>
> This approach might not work as expected if drm_exec_until_all_locked
> "loops" can be nested, but that doesn't appear to be an existing use
> case in the codebase.
>
> Fixes: commit 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7")
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890
> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_exec.h | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> index 73205afec162..393ac022ed3a 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
> @@ -70,18 +70,9 @@ struct drm_exec {
> * Core functionality of the drm_exec object. Loops until all GEM objects are
> * locked and no more contention exists. At the beginning of the loop it is
> * guaranteed that no GEM object is locked.
> - *
> - * Since labels can't be defined local to the loops body we use a jump pointer
> - * to make sure that the retry is only used from within the loops body.
> */
> #define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) \
> - for (void *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; ({ \
> - __label__ __drm_exec_retry; \
> -__drm_exec_retry: \
> - __drm_exec_retry_ptr = &&__drm_exec_retry; \
> - (void)__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
> - drm_exec_cleanup(exec); \
> - });)
> + while(drm_exec_cleanup(exec))
>
> /**
> * drm_exec_retry_on_contention - restart the loop to grap all locks
> @@ -93,7 +84,7 @@ __drm_exec_retry: \
> #define drm_exec_retry_on_contention(exec) \
> do { \
> if (unlikely(drm_exec_is_contended(exec))) \
> - goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \
> + continue; \
d'oh that's going to continue the do {} while(0) ... let me send a v2...
> } while (0)
>
> /**
>
> ---
> base-commit: 451cc82bd11eb6a374f4dbcfc1cf007eafea91ab
> change-id: 20230727-amdgpu-93c0e5302951
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers