qcom_check_op() function checks for the invalid opcode for the instruction
types. Currently, it just returns -ENOTSUPP for all opcodes of
NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR type due to the use of "||" operator instead of "&&".
Fix it!
This also fixes the following smatch warning:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c:3036 qcom_check_op() warn: was && intended here instead of ||?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
Fixes: 89550beb098e ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Implement exec_op()")
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 4957e9253878..29fcdac932f1 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -3033,12 +3033,12 @@ static int qcom_check_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
switch (instr->type) {
case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
- if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_RESET ||
- instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_READID ||
- instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_PARAM ||
- instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_ERASE1 ||
- instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_ERASE2 ||
- instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_STATUS ||
+ if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_RESET &&
+ instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_READID &&
+ instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_PARAM &&
+ instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_ERASE1 &&
+ instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_ERASE2 &&
+ instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_STATUS &&
instr->ctx.cmd.opcode != NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG)
return -ENOTSUPP;
break;
--
2.25.1