Extend page_tables.rst by adding a section about the role of MMU and TLB
in translating between virtual addresses and physical page frames.
Furthermore explain the concept behind Page Faults and how the Linux
kernel handles TLB misses. Finally briefly explain how and why to disable
the page faults handler.
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <[email protected]>
---
v1 -> v2: This version takes into account the comments provided by Mike
(thanks!). I hope I haven't overlooked anything he suggested :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Furthermore, v2 adds few more information about swapping which was not present
in v1.
before the "real" patch, this has been an RFC PATCH in its 2nd version for a week
or so until I received comments and suggestions from Jonathan Cameron (thanks!),
and then it morphed to a real patch.
The link to the thread with the RFC PATCH v2 and the messages between Jonathan
and me start at https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/#r
Documentation/mm/page_tables.rst | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/page_tables.rst b/Documentation/mm/page_tables.rst
index 7840c1891751..ad9e52f2d7f1 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/page_tables.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/page_tables.rst
@@ -152,3 +152,131 @@ Page table handling code that wishes to be architecture-neutral, such as the
virtual memory manager, will need to be written so that it traverses all of the
currently five levels. This style should also be preferred for
architecture-specific code, so as to be robust to future changes.
+
+
+MMU, TLB, and Page Faults
+=========================
+
+The `Memory Management Unit (MMU)` is a hardware component that handles virtual
+to physical address translations. It may use relatively small caches in hardware
+called `Translation Lookaside Buffers (TLBs)` and `Page Walk Caches` to speed up
+these translations.
+
+When CPU accesses a memory location, it provides a virtual address to the MMU,
+which checks if there is the existing translation in the TLB or in the Page
+Walk Caches (on architectures that support them). If no translation is found,
+MMU uses the page walks to determine the physical address and create the map.
+
+The dirty bit for a page is set (i.e., turned on) when the page is written to.
+Each page of memory has associated permission and dirty bits. The latter
+indicate that the page has been modified since it was loaded into memory.
+
+If nothing prevents it, eventually the physical memory can be accessed and the
+requested operation on the physical frame is performed.
+
+There are several reasons why the MMU can't find certain translations. It could
+happen because the CPU is trying to access memory that the current task is not
+permitted to, or because the data is not present into physical memory.
+
+When these conditions happen, the MMU triggers page faults, which are types of
+exceptions that signal the CPU to pause the current execution and run a special
+function to handle the mentioned exceptions.
+
+Page faults may be caused by code bugs or by maliciously crafted addresses that
+the CPU is instructed to dereference and access. A thread of a process could
+use an instruction to address (non-shared) memory which does not belong to its
+own address space, or could try to execute an instruction that want to write to
+a read-only location.
+
+If the above-mentioned conditions happen in user-space, the kernel sends a
+`Segmentation Fault` (SIGSEGV) signal to the current thread. That signal usually
+causes the termination of the thread and of the process it belongs to.
+
+Instead, there are also common and expected other causes of page faults. These
+are triggered by process management optimization techniques called "Lazy
+Allocation" and "Copy-on-Write". Page faults may also happen when frames have
+been swapped out to persistent storage (swap partition or file) and evicted from
+their physical locations.
+
+These techniques improve memory efficiency, reduce latency, and minimize space
+occupation. This document won't go deeper into the details of "Lazy Allocation"
+and "Copy-on-Write" because these subjects are out of scope for they belong to
+Process Address Management.
+
+Swapping differentiate itself from the other mentioned techniques because it's
+not so desirable since it's performed as a means to reduce memory under heavy
+pressure.
+
+Swapping can't work for memory mapped by kernel logical addresses. These are a
+subset of the kernel virtual space that directly maps a contiguous range of
+physical memory. Given any logical address, its physical address is determined
+with simple arithmetic on an offset. Accesses to logical addresses are fast
+because they avoid the need for complex page table lookups at the expenses of
+frames not being evictable and pageable out.
+
+If everything fails to make room for the data that must reside be present in
+physical frames, the kernel invokes the out-of-memory (OOM) killer to make room
+by terminating lower priority processes until pressure reduces under a safe
+threshold.
+
+This document is going to simplify and show an high altitude view of how the
+Linux kernel handles these page faults, creates tables and tables' entries,
+check if memory is present and, if not, requests to load data from persistent
+storage or from other devices, and updates the MMU and its caches...
+
+The first steps are architectures dependent. Most architectures jump to
+`do_page_fault()`, whereas the x86 interrupt handler is defined by the
+`DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW_ERRORCODE()` macro which calls `handle_page_fault()`.
+
+Whatever the routes, all architectures end up to the invocation of
+`handle_mm_fault()` which, in turn, (likely) ends up calling
+`__handle_mm_fault()` to carry out the actual work of allocation of the page
+tables.
+
+The unfortunate case of not being able to call `__handle_mm_fault()` means
+that the virtual address is pointing to areas of physical memory which are not
+permitted to be accessed (at least from the current context). This
+condition resolves to the kernel sending the above-mentioned SIGSEGV signal
+to the process and leads to the consequences already explained.
+
+`__handle_mm_fault()` carries out its work by calling several functions to
+find the entry's offsets of the upper layers of the page tables and allocate
+the tables that it may need to.
+
+The functions that look for the offset have names like `*_offset()`, where the
+"*" is for pgd, p4d, pud, pmd, pte; instead the functions to allocate the
+corresponding tables, layer by layer, are called `*_alloc`, using the
+above-mentioned convention to name them after the corresponding types of tables
+in the hierarchy.
+
+The page table walk may end at one of the middle or upper layers (PMD, PUD).
+
+Linux supports larger page sizes than the usual 4KB (i.e., the so called
+`huge pages`). When using these kinds of larger pages, higher level pages can
+directly map them, with no need to use lower level page entries (PTE). Huge
+pages contain large contiguos physical regions that usually span from 2MB to
+1GB. They are respectively mapped by the PMD and PUD page entries.
+
+The huge pages bring with them several benefits like reduced TLB pressure,
+reduced page table overhead, memory allocation efficiency, and performance
+improvement for certain workloads. However, these benefits come with
+trade-offs, like wasted memory and allocation challenges. Huge pages are out
+of scope of the present document, therefore, it won't go into further details.
+
+At the very end of the walk with allocations, if it didn't return errors,
+`__handle_mm_fault()` finally calls `handle_pte_fault()`, which via `do_fault()`
+performs one of `do_read_fault()`, `do_cow_fault()`, `do_shared_fault()`.
+"read", "cow", "shared" give hints about the reasons and the kind of fault it's
+handling.
+
+The actual implementation of the workflow is very complex. Its design allows
+Linux to handle page faults in a way that is tailored to the specific
+characteristics of each architecture, while still sharing a common overall
+structure.
+
+To conclude this brief overview from very high altitude of how Linux handles
+page faults, let's add that page faults handler can be disabled and enabled
+respectively with `pagefault_disable()` and `pagefault_enable()`.
+
+Several code path make use of the latter two functions because they need to
+disable traps into the page faults handler, mostly to prevent deadlocks.
--
2.41.0