Add a simple unit test for the pseudo moving-sum function
(damon_moving_sum()).
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>
---
mm/damon/core-test.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h
index 6cc8b245586d..c539f0e8377e 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h
@@ -341,6 +341,21 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
}
+static void damon_test_moving_sum(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ unsigned int mvsum = 50000, nomvsum = 50000, len_window = 10;
+ unsigned int new_values[] = {10000, 0, 10000, 0, 0, 0, 10000, 0, 0, 0};
+ unsigned int expects[] = {55000, 50000, 55000, 50000, 45000, 40000,
+ 45000, 40000, 35000, 30000};
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(new_values); i++) {
+ mvsum = damon_moving_sum(mvsum, nomvsum, len_window,
+ new_values[i]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mvsum, expects[i]);
+ }
+}
+
static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
{
struct damos_filter *filter;
@@ -425,6 +440,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_regions),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_monitoring_result),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_attrs),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_moving_sum),
KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_filter),
KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_filter_out),
{},
--
2.25.1