Make it readable and comprehensible.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -265,25 +265,19 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *d
return;
/* Save for early loading */
- intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
+ intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
}
-/*
- * Get microcode matching with BSP's model. Only CPUs with the same model as
- * BSP can stay in the platform.
- */
-static struct microcode_intel *
-scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)
+/* Scan CPIO for microcode matching the boot CPUs family, model, stepping */
+static struct microcode_intel *scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
+ struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)
{
struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header;
struct microcode_intel *patch = NULL;
u32 cur_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
unsigned int mc_size;
- while (size) {
- if (size < sizeof(struct microcode_header_intel))
- break;
-
+ for (; size >= sizeof(struct microcode_header_intel); size -= mc_size, data += mc_size) {
mc_header = (struct microcode_header_intel *)data;
mc_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
@@ -291,27 +285,19 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
intel_microcode_sanity_check(data, false, MC_HEADER_TYPE_MICROCODE) < 0)
break;
- size -= mc_size;
-
- if (!intel_find_matching_signature(data, uci->cpu_sig.sig,
- uci->cpu_sig.pf)) {
- data += mc_size;
+ if (!intel_find_matching_signature(data, uci->cpu_sig.sig, uci->cpu_sig.pf))
continue;
- }
/* BSP scan: Check whether there is newer microcode */
if (!save && cur_rev >= mc_header->rev)
- goto next;
+ continue;
/* Save scan: Check whether there is newer or matching microcode */
if (save && cur_rev != mc_header->rev)
- goto next;
+ continue;
patch = data;
cur_rev = mc_header->rev;
-
-next:
- data += mc_size;
}
if (size)
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Make it readable and comprehensible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 ++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -265,25 +265,19 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *d
> return;
>
> /* Save for early loading */
> - intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
> + intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)p;
This got committed by mistake.
> -/*
> - * Get microcode matching with BSP's model. Only CPUs with the same model as
> - * BSP can stay in the platform.
> - */
> -static struct microcode_intel *
> -scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)
> +/* Scan CPIO for microcode matching the boot CPUs family, model, stepping */
"... the boot CPU's... " or simply the "BSP's".
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette