2023-09-17 19:45:17

by Piro Yang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] staging: vme_user: Fixed prink formatting issues

Fixed issues relating to prink message including:

a. using __func__ to replace function's name
b. using pr_warn to replace "printk(KERN_ERR"

Issue found by checkpatch

Signed-off-by: Piro Yang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
index 5960562dcd96..56c528628e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int vme_slave_get(struct vme_resource *resource, int *enabled,
image = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_slave_resource, list);

if (!bridge->slave_get) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "vme_slave_get not supported\n");
+ pr_warn("%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int vme_master_set(struct vme_resource *resource, int enabled,
image = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_master_resource, list);

if (!bridge->master_set) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "vme_master_set not supported\n");
+ pr_warn("%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ int vme_master_get(struct vme_resource *resource, int *enabled,
image = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_master_resource, list);

if (!bridge->master_get) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s not supported\n", __func__);
+ pr_warn("%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -1552,7 +1552,7 @@ int vme_lm_set(struct vme_resource *resource, unsigned long long lm_base,
lm = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_lm_resource, list);

if (!bridge->lm_set) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "vme_lm_set not supported\n");
+ pr_warn("%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ int vme_lm_get(struct vme_resource *resource, unsigned long long *lm_base,
lm = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_lm_resource, list);

if (!bridge->lm_get) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "vme_lm_get not supported\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ int vme_lm_attach(struct vme_resource *resource, int monitor,
lm = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_lm_resource, list);

if (!bridge->lm_attach) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "vme_lm_attach not supported\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ int vme_lm_detach(struct vme_resource *resource, int monitor)
lm = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_lm_resource, list);

if (!bridge->lm_detach) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "vme_lm_detach not supported\n");
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

@@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ int vme_slot_num(struct vme_dev *vdev)
}

if (!bridge->slot_get) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "vme_slot_num not supported\n");
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s not supported\n", __func__);
return -EINVAL;
}

--
2.25.1


2023-09-18 06:13:21

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vme_user: Fixed prink formatting issues

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 01:18:24AM +0800, Piro Yang wrote:
> Fixed issues relating to prink message including:
>
> a. using __func__ to replace function's name
> b. using pr_warn to replace "printk(KERN_ERR"
>
> Issue found by checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Piro Yang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
> index 5960562dcd96..56c528628e7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vme_user/vme.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int vme_slave_get(struct vme_resource *resource, int *enabled,
> image = list_entry(resource->entry, struct vme_slave_resource, list);
>
> if (!bridge->slave_get) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "vme_slave_get not supported\n");
> + pr_warn("%s not supported\n", __func__);

KERN_ERR is not the same thing a pr_warn(), why did you make this
change?

And you are doing multiple things in the same change, why?

Also, drivers should always use dev_warn(), not pr_*() calls.

thanks,

greg k-h