Hi Nick,
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:18:36 -0700 Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 08:42:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on i386 or x86_64:
> >
> > ../arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c: In function 'execmem_arch_params':
> > ../arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:54:50: error: implicit declaration of function 'kaslr_enabled'; did you mean 'kasan_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 54 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE) && kaslr_enabled())
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | kasan_enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > git blames this on:
> >
> > commit 12633d679796
> > Author: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue Sep 19 15:14:03 2023 +1000
> >
> > Revert "arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES"
> >
> > This reverts commit 3300c3af20090ff5e03e5c4bf2ef2cfaa03d4e9b.
>
> Thanks for the report, FWIW, our CI is hitting this, too.
>
> Was 12633d679796 a pure revert, or was it manually modified?
It was a pure revert due to having to revert a previous commit to fix a
boot warning. These reverts should not need to be in the next
linux-next as a patch has been applied to the appropriate included tree
to fix the boot warning.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell