On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> In some cases the OPP tables aren't specified in device tree, but rather
> encoded in the FW. To allow a genpd provider to specify them dynamically
> instead, let's add a new genpd flag, GENPD_FLAG_OPP_TABLE_FW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - None.
>
Just checking if I need Rafael's ack here or that is OK as you are
co-maintainer ? Again asking explicitly to ensure arm-soc is happy when
I send PR.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 13:20, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 01:26:32PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > In some cases the OPP tables aren't specified in device tree, but rather
> > encoded in the FW. To allow a genpd provider to specify them dynamically
> > instead, let's add a new genpd flag, GENPD_FLAG_OPP_TABLE_FW.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - None.
> >
>
> Just checking if I need Rafael's ack here or that is OK as you are
> co-maintainer ? Again asking explicitly to ensure arm-soc is happy when
> I send PR.
This should be fine for you to pick up. Rafael would have objected if
this was something that he didn't like. Moreover, there's no other
patches being queued for genpd at this moment so no worries of
conflicts.
Kind regards
Uffe