Document the compatible string for the UFS found on SC7280.
Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
index 462ead5a1cec..802640efa956 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties:
- qcom,msm8996-ufshc
- qcom,msm8998-ufshc
- qcom,sa8775p-ufshc
+ - qcom,sc7280-ufshc
- qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
- qcom,sdm845-ufshc
- qcom,sm6115-ufshc
@@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ allOf:
enum:
- qcom,msm8998-ufshc
- qcom,sa8775p-ufshc
+ - qcom,sc7280-ufshc
- qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
- qcom,sm8250-ufshc
- qcom,sm8350-ufshc
--
2.17.1
On 29/09/2023 15:19, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> Document the compatible string for the UFS found on SC7280.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof