2023-09-28 17:22:32

by Jisheng Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add T-HEAD PWM driver

T-HEAD SoCs such as the TH1520 contain a PWM controller used
among other things to control the LCD backlight, fan and so on.
Add driver for it.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++
drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 302 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d55e40060c46..86cf0926dbfc 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -18482,6 +18482,7 @@ L: [email protected]
S: Maintained
F: arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/
F: drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-thead.c
+F: drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c

RNBD BLOCK DRIVERS
M: Md. Haris Iqbal <[email protected]>
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index 8ebcddf91f7b..428fa365a19a 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
@@ -637,6 +637,17 @@ config PWM_TEGRA
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
will be called pwm-tegra.

+config PWM_THEAD
+ tristate "T-HEAD PWM support"
+ depends on ARCH_THEAD || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on HAS_IOMEM
+ help
+ Generic PWM framework driver for the PWFM controller found on THEAD
+ SoCs.
+
+ To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
+ will be called pwm-thead.
+
config PWM_TIECAP
tristate "ECAP PWM support"
depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX || ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
index c822389c2a24..4c317e6316e8 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STMPE) += pwm-stmpe.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN4I) += pwm-sun4i.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUNPLUS) += pwm-sunplus.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_THEAD) += pwm-thead.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIEHRPWM) += pwm-tiehrpwm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL) += pwm-twl.o
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8339f5617b6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
@@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * T-HEAD PWM driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Alibaba Group Holding Limited.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define MAX_PWM_NUM 6
+
+#define LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) ((n) * 0x20)
+#define LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x00)
+#define LIGHT_PWM_RPT(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x04)
+#define LIGHT_PWM_PER(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x08)
+#define LIGHT_PWM_FP(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x0c)
+#define LIGHT_PWM_STATUS(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x10)
+
+/* bit definition PWM_CTRL */
+#define PWM_START BIT(0)
+#define PWM_SOFT_RST BIT(1)
+#define PWM_CFG_UPDATE BIT(2)
+#define PWM_INT_EN BIT(3)
+#define PWM_ONE_SHOT_MODE BIT(4)
+#define PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE BIT(5)
+#define PWM_EVT_RISING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(6)
+#define PWM_EVT_FALLING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(7)
+#define PWM_FPOUT BIT(8)
+#define PWM_INFACTOUT BIT(9)
+
+struct thead_pwm_chip {
+ struct clk *clk;
+ void __iomem *mmio_base;
+ struct pwm_chip chip;
+};
+
+#define to_thead_pwm_chip(chip) container_of(chip, struct thead_pwm_chip, chip)
+
+static int thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
+{
+ return clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk);
+}
+
+static void thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
+{
+ clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
+}
+
+static int thead_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 value;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+ value |= PWM_START;
+ writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void thead_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 value;
+
+ value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+ value &= ~PWM_START;
+ writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
+}
+
+static int thead_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
+ unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
+ unsigned long duty_cycle, period_cycle;
+ u32 pwm_cfg = PWM_INFACTOUT | PWM_FPOUT | PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE | PWM_INT_EN;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (duty_ns > period_ns) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid pwm configure\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ period_cycle = period_ns * rate;
+ do_div(period_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ writel(period_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_PER(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ duty_cycle = duty_ns * rate;
+ do_div(duty_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ writel(duty_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_FP(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ pwm_cfg = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+ pwm_cfg |= PWM_CFG_UPDATE;
+ writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int thead_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+ struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
+ u32 value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+ value |= PWM_FPOUT;
+ else
+ value &= ~PWM_FPOUT;
+
+ writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int thead_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ int err;
+ bool enabled = pwm->state.enabled;
+
+ if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity)
+ thead_pwm_set_polarity(chip, pwm, state->polarity);
+
+ if (!state->enabled) {
+ if (enabled)
+ thead_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ err = thead_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!enabled)
+ return thead_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops thead_pwm_ops = {
+ .apply = thead_pwm_apply,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int thead_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc;
+ int ret;
+
+ pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
+
+ pc->mmio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(pc->mmio_base))
+ return PTR_ERR(pc->mmio_base);
+
+ pc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(pc->clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(pc->clk);
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
+ ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
+ goto err_pm_disable;
+ }
+
+ pc->chip.ops = &thead_pwm_ops;
+ pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+ pc->chip.npwm = MAX_PWM_NUM;
+
+ ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_clk_disable;
+
+ pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_clk_disable:
+ thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
+err_pm_disable:
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void thead_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
+ thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
+ pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id thead_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
+ {.compatible = "thead,th1520-pwm",},
+ {/* sentinel */}
+};
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops thead_pwm_pm_ops = {
+ SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(thead_pwm_runtime_suspend, thead_pwm_runtime_resume, NULL)
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver thead_pwm_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "thead-pwm",
+ .of_match_table = thead_pwm_dt_ids,
+ .pm = &thead_pwm_pm_ops,
+ },
+ .probe = thead_pwm_probe,
+ .remove_new = thead_pwm_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(thead_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("wei.liu <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("T-HEAD pwm driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.40.1


2023-09-29 14:24:43

by Emil Renner Berthing

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add T-HEAD PWM driver

Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> T-HEAD SoCs such as the TH1520 contain a PWM controller used
> among other things to control the LCD backlight, fan and so on.
> Add driver for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 302 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d55e40060c46..86cf0926dbfc 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18482,6 +18482,7 @@ L: [email protected]
> S: Maintained
> F: arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/
> F: drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-thead.c
> +F: drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
>
> RNBD BLOCK DRIVERS
> M: Md. Haris Iqbal <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 8ebcddf91f7b..428fa365a19a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -637,6 +637,17 @@ config PWM_TEGRA
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-tegra.
>
> +config PWM_THEAD
> + tristate "T-HEAD PWM support"
> + depends on ARCH_THEAD || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM
> + help
> + Generic PWM framework driver for the PWFM controller found on THEAD
> + SoCs.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> + will be called pwm-thead.
> +
> config PWM_TIECAP
> tristate "ECAP PWM support"
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX || ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index c822389c2a24..4c317e6316e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STMPE) += pwm-stmpe.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN4I) += pwm-sun4i.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUNPLUS) += pwm-sunplus.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_THEAD) += pwm-thead.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIEHRPWM) += pwm-tiehrpwm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL) += pwm-twl.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8339f5617b6f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * T-HEAD PWM driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Alibaba Group Holding Limited.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define MAX_PWM_NUM 6
> +
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) ((n) * 0x20)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x00)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_RPT(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x04)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_PER(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x08)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_FP(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x0c)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_STATUS(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x10)
> +
> +/* bit definition PWM_CTRL */
> +#define PWM_START BIT(0)
> +#define PWM_SOFT_RST BIT(1)
> +#define PWM_CFG_UPDATE BIT(2)
> +#define PWM_INT_EN BIT(3)
> +#define PWM_ONE_SHOT_MODE BIT(4)
> +#define PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE BIT(5)
> +#define PWM_EVT_RISING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(6)
> +#define PWM_EVT_FALLING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(7)
> +#define PWM_FPOUT BIT(8)
> +#define PWM_INFACTOUT BIT(9)

Hi Jisheng,

I'd be worried that these defines one day clash with the PWM framework. Maybe
just keep the LIGHT_PWM_ prefix?

> +
> +struct thead_pwm_chip {
> + struct clk *clk;
> + void __iomem *mmio_base;
> + struct pwm_chip chip;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_thead_pwm_chip(chip) container_of(chip, struct thead_pwm_chip, chip)
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
> +{
> + return clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk);
> +}
> +
> +static void thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
> +{
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
> +}

These two wrappers don't seem to add a lot of value compared to just writing
clk_*(pc->clk) directly and they're not used as callbacks.

> +
> +static int thead_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + value |= PWM_START;
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void thead_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value;
> +
> + value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + value &= ~PWM_START;
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
> + unsigned long duty_cycle, period_cycle;
> + u32 pwm_cfg = PWM_INFACTOUT | PWM_FPOUT | PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE | PWM_INT_EN;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (duty_ns > period_ns) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid pwm configure\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + period_cycle = period_ns * rate;
> + do_div(period_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);

I thought do_div() was only needed to do 64bit by 32bit divisions on
32bit hardware, but here
period_cycle is an unsigned long, so only 32bit on 32bit hardware.

> + writel(period_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_PER(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + duty_cycle = duty_ns * rate;
> + do_div(duty_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);

Same as above.

> + writel(duty_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_FP(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pwm_cfg = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + pwm_cfg |= PWM_CFG_UPDATE;
> + writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> + value |= PWM_FPOUT;
> + else
> + value &= ~PWM_FPOUT;
> +
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + int err;
> + bool enabled = pwm->state.enabled;
> +
> + if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity)
> + thead_pwm_set_polarity(chip, pwm, state->polarity);
> +
> + if (!state->enabled) {
> + if (enabled)
> + thead_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + err = thead_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!enabled)
> + return thead_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops thead_pwm_ops = {
> + .apply = thead_pwm_apply,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
> +
> + pc->mmio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(pc->mmio_base))
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->mmio_base);
> +
> + pc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(pc->clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->clk);

A lot of other drivers have something like
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(pc->clk), "failed to get clock\n");
when failing to get clocks.

> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> + ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
> + goto err_pm_disable;
> + }
> +
> + pc->chip.ops = &thead_pwm_ops;
> + pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> + pc->chip.npwm = MAX_PWM_NUM;
> +
> + ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_clk_disable;
> +
> + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_disable:
> + thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
> +err_pm_disable:
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);

Here you disable the clock and then pm_runtime_disable()..

> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void thead_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);

..but here it's the other way around. It may not make a difference, but let's
be consistent anyway.

> + pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id thead_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> + {.compatible = "thead,th1520-pwm",},
> + {/* sentinel */}
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops thead_pwm_pm_ops = {
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(thead_pwm_runtime_suspend, thead_pwm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver thead_pwm_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "thead-pwm",
> + .of_match_table = thead_pwm_dt_ids,
> + .pm = &thead_pwm_pm_ops,
> + },
> + .probe = thead_pwm_probe,
> + .remove_new = thead_pwm_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(thead_pwm_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("wei.liu <[email protected]>");

wei.liu is a very uncommon name, do you mean Wei Liu?

> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("T-HEAD pwm driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

2023-09-29 15:49:24

by Uwe Kleine-König

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: add T-HEAD PWM driver

Hello,

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 01:02:54AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> T-HEAD SoCs such as the TH1520 contain a PWM controller used
> among other things to control the LCD backlight, fan and so on.
> Add driver for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++
> drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 302 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d55e40060c46..86cf0926dbfc 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18482,6 +18482,7 @@ L: [email protected]
> S: Maintained
> F: arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/
> F: drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-thead.c
> +F: drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
>
> RNBD BLOCK DRIVERS
> M: Md. Haris Iqbal <[email protected]>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> index 8ebcddf91f7b..428fa365a19a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> @@ -637,6 +637,17 @@ config PWM_TEGRA
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> will be called pwm-tegra.
>
> +config PWM_THEAD
> + tristate "T-HEAD PWM support"
> + depends on ARCH_THEAD || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM
> + help
> + Generic PWM framework driver for the PWFM controller found on THEAD
> + SoCs.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> + will be called pwm-thead.
> +
> config PWM_TIECAP
> tristate "ECAP PWM support"
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX || ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3 || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> index c822389c2a24..4c317e6316e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STMPE) += pwm-stmpe.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUN4I) += pwm-sun4i.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SUNPLUS) += pwm-sunplus.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TEGRA) += pwm-tegra.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_THEAD) += pwm-thead.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIECAP) += pwm-tiecap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TIEHRPWM) += pwm-tiehrpwm.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL) += pwm-twl.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8339f5617b6f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-thead.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * T-HEAD PWM driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Alibaba Group Holding Limited.

If you have a public link to a reference manual, please mention this
here. Also please add a section that describes hardware (and software)
limitations sticking to the format in other drivers. The idea is that

sed -rn '/Limitations:/,/\*\/?$/p'

tells you about (at least) about the following properties:

- Can the PWM be updated atomically?
- Does it complete the current running period before switching to the
new configuration?
- How does the output behave when disabled?

> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define MAX_PWM_NUM 6
> +
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) ((n) * 0x20)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x00)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_RPT(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x04)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_PER(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x08)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_FP(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x0c)
> +#define LIGHT_PWM_STATUS(n) (LIGHT_PWM_CHN_BASE(n) + 0x10)
> +
> +/* bit definition PWM_CTRL */
> +#define PWM_START BIT(0)
> +#define PWM_SOFT_RST BIT(1)
> +#define PWM_CFG_UPDATE BIT(2)
> +#define PWM_INT_EN BIT(3)
> +#define PWM_ONE_SHOT_MODE BIT(4)
> +#define PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE BIT(5)
> +#define PWM_EVT_RISING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(6)
> +#define PWM_EVT_FALLING_TRIG_UNDER_ONE_SHOT BIT(7)
> +#define PWM_FPOUT BIT(8)
> +#define PWM_INFACTOUT BIT(9)

Emil already criticised the naming here (Thanks btw for the review!). I
also want you to use a consistent prefix, but I wonder about "LIGHT_", I
would have expected "THEAD_" matching the driver name?!

> +struct thead_pwm_chip {
> + struct clk *clk;
> + void __iomem *mmio_base;
> + struct pwm_chip chip;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_thead_pwm_chip(chip) container_of(chip, struct thead_pwm_chip, chip)

This is wrong. Try:

struct pwm_chip *mychip;
struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(mychip);

. (Of course you shouldn't name a pwm_chip "mychip", "chip" is fine.
Still this is too ugly.) I suggest a static inline here, ideally one
that has a name starting with "thead_pwm_". thead_pwm_from_chip() comes
to mind.

> +static int thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
> +{
> + return clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk);
> +}
> +
> +static void thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(struct thead_pwm_chip *pc)
> +{
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
> +}

I agree to Emil here that these wrappers are too thin. (Also you might
get rid of them completely, see below.)

> +static int thead_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);

This function is typically called directly after thead_pwm_config()
which ended with calling pm_runtime_put_sync(). If you put the logic of
.apply() in a single function (or move runtime pm handling in there) you
can prevent some put/get ping-pong.

> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);

Please use %pe for better readable error messages.

> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + value |= PWM_START;
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void thead_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value;
> +
> + value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + value &= ~PWM_START;
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
> + unsigned long duty_cycle, period_cycle;
> + u32 pwm_cfg = PWM_INFACTOUT | PWM_FPOUT | PWM_CONTINUOUS_MODE | PWM_INT_EN;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (duty_ns > period_ns) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid pwm configure\n");
> + return -EINVAL;

You can assume that won't happen (once you fixed the implicit type cast
in the call to thead_pwm_config pointed out below).

> + }
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + period_cycle = period_ns * rate;

This might overflow. Please use mul_u64_u64_div_u64 here together with
making sure that rate <= NSEC_PER_SEC.

> + do_div(period_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + writel(period_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_PER(pwm->hwpwm));
> + duty_cycle = duty_ns * rate;
> + do_div(duty_cycle, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + writel(duty_cycle, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_FP(pwm->hwpwm));
> +
> + pwm_cfg = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + pwm_cfg |= PWM_CFG_UPDATE;
> + writel(pwm_cfg, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));

I assume this means period and duty_cycle are updated atomically (i.e.
at no time the hardware is configured to emit a wave that has the new
period but the old duty_cycle)?

Is this needed even if the PWM is currently off and you write PWM_START
a moment later? Can writing PWM_CFG_UPDATE and PWM_START be done in a
single step?

> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_set_polarity(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + enum pwm_polarity polarity)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = to_thead_pwm_chip(chip);
> + u32 value = readl(pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to clock on the pwm device(%d)\n", ret);

Please don't make .apply() emit an error message.

> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> + value |= PWM_FPOUT;
> + else
> + value &= ~PWM_FPOUT;
> +
> + writel(value, pc->mmio_base + LIGHT_PWM_CTRL(pwm->hwpwm));

Oh, no PWM_CFG_UPDATE here? So writing the polarity takes effect
immediately? If so, please note this is the Limitations section I
asked for above.

> + pm_runtime_put_sync(chip->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + int err;
> + bool enabled = pwm->state.enabled;
> +
> + if (state->polarity != pwm->state.polarity)
> + thead_pwm_set_polarity(chip, pwm, state->polarity);
> +
> + if (!state->enabled) {
> + if (enabled)
> + thead_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + err = thead_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);

state->duty_cycle is an u64, but thead_pwm_config takes an int ...

> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (!enabled)
> + return thead_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops thead_pwm_ops = {
> + .apply = thead_pwm_apply,

Please implement .get_state() and test with PWM_DEBUG enabled.

> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused thead_pwm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int thead_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct thead_pwm_chip *pc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
> +
> + pc->mmio_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(pc->mmio_base))
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->mmio_base);
> +
> + pc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

devm_clk_get_enabled()

> + if (IS_ERR(pc->clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->clk);
> +
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> + ret = thead_pwm_clk_prepare_enable(pc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable pwm clock(%d)\n", ret);
> + goto err_pm_disable;
> + }
> +
> + pc->chip.ops = &thead_pwm_ops;
> + pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> + pc->chip.npwm = MAX_PWM_NUM;
> +
> + ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);

devm_pwmchip_add()

> + if (ret)
> + goto err_clk_disable;
> +
> + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_disable:
> + thead_pwm_clk_disable_unprepare(pc);
> +err_pm_disable:
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + return ret;
> +}

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


Attachments:
(No filename) (11.96 kB)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments