2023-10-07 12:46:43

by Chuyi Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] bpf: Introduce css open-coded iterator kfuncs

This Patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy} which allow
creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_css in open-coded iterator
style. These kfuncs actually wrapps css_next_descendant_{pre, post}.
css_iter can be used to:

1) iterating a sepcific cgroup tree with pre/post/up order

2) iterating cgroup_subsystem in BPF Prog, like
for_each_mem_cgroup_tree/cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre in kernel.

The API design is consistent with cgroup_iter. bpf_iter_css_new accepts
parameters defining iteration order and starting css. Here we also reuse
BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST,
BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP enums.

Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 +
.../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 6 ++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
index 810378f04fbc..9c6ad892ae82 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
@@ -294,3 +294,62 @@ static int __init bpf_cgroup_iter_init(void)
}

late_initcall(bpf_cgroup_iter_init);
+
+struct bpf_iter_css {
+ __u64 __opaque[3];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_css_kern {
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *start;
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos;
+ unsigned int flags;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *start, unsigned int flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css));
+
+ kit->start = NULL;
+ switch (flags) {
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE:
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST:
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP:
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ kit->start = start;
+ kit->pos = NULL;
+ kit->flags = flags;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct cgroup_subsys_state *bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
+{
+ struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+ if (!kit->start)
+ return NULL;
+
+ switch (kit->flags) {
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE:
+ kit->pos = css_next_descendant_pre(kit->pos, kit->start);
+ break;
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST:
+ kit->pos = css_next_descendant_post(kit->pos, kit->start);
+ break;
+ case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP:
+ kit->pos = kit->pos ? kit->pos->parent : kit->start;
+ }
+
+ return kit->pos;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
+{
+}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 8111437a999e..7596e83d6715 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2555,6 +2555,9 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 1ec82997cce7..9aab609f6edd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -463,4 +463,10 @@ extern int bpf_iter_task_new(struct bpf_iter_task *it,
extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_task_next(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;
extern void bpf_iter_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;

+struct bpf_iter_css;
+extern int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
+ struct cgroup_subsys_state *start, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
+extern struct cgroup_subsys_state *bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it) __weak __ksym;
+
#endif
--
2.20.1


2023-10-07 16:06:22

by kernel test robot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] bpf: Introduce css open-coded iterator kfuncs

Hi Chuyi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chuyi-Zhou/cgroup-Prepare-for-using-css_task_iter_-in-BPF/20231007-204750
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231007124522.34834-5-zhouchuyi%40bytedance.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] bpf: Introduce css open-coded iterator kfuncs
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231007/[email protected]/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231007/[email protected]/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:308:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_iter_css_new' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
308 | __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:332:41: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_iter_css_next' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
332 | __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup_subsys_state *bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:353:18: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_iter_css_destroy' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
353 | __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:
kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_new':
include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_320' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css)
425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
406 | prefix ## suffix(); \
| ^~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:313:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
313 | BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/bpf_iter_css_new +308 kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c

307
> 308 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
309 struct cgroup_subsys_state *start, unsigned int flags)
310 {
311 struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
312
313 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));
314 BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css));
315
316 kit->start = NULL;
317 switch (flags) {
318 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE:
319 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST:
320 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP:
321 break;
322 default:
323 return -EINVAL;
324 }
325
326 kit->start = start;
327 kit->pos = NULL;
328 kit->flags = flags;
329 return 0;
330 }
331
> 332 __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup_subsys_state *bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
333 {
334 struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
335
336 if (!kit->start)
337 return NULL;
338
339 switch (kit->flags) {
340 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE:
341 kit->pos = css_next_descendant_pre(kit->pos, kit->start);
342 break;
343 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST:
344 kit->pos = css_next_descendant_post(kit->pos, kit->start);
345 break;
346 case BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP:
347 kit->pos = kit->pos ? kit->pos->parent : kit->start;
348 }
349
350 return kit->pos;
351 }
352
> 353 __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it)

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

2023-10-11 04:44:55

by Chuyi Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] bpf: Introduce css open-coded iterator kfuncs



在 2023/10/7 20:45, Chuyi Zhou 写道:
> This Patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy} which allow
> creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_css in open-coded iterator
> style. These kfuncs actually wrapps css_next_descendant_{pre, post}.
> css_iter can be used to:
>
> 1) iterating a sepcific cgroup tree with pre/post/up order
>
> 2) iterating cgroup_subsystem in BPF Prog, like
> for_each_mem_cgroup_tree/cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre in kernel.
>
> The API design is consistent with cgroup_iter. bpf_iter_css_new accepts
> parameters defining iteration order and starting css. Here we also reuse
> BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST,
> BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP enums.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 3 +
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 6 ++
> 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
> index 810378f04fbc..9c6ad892ae82 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
> @@ -294,3 +294,62 @@ static int __init bpf_cgroup_iter_init(void)
> }
>
> late_initcall(bpf_cgroup_iter_init);
> +
> +struct bpf_iter_css {
> + __u64 __opaque[3];
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> +struct bpf_iter_css_kern {
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *start;
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos;
> + unsigned int flags;
> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
> + struct cgroup_subsys_state *start, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css));
> +

This would cause the fail of netdev/build_32bit CI
(https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/790929/13412333/build_32bit/stderr):

tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings: warning: ignored by one of the
.gitignore files
../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:308:17: warning: no previous prototype for
‘bpf_iter_css_new’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
308 | __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:332:41: warning: no previous prototype for
‘bpf_iter_css_next’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
332 | __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup_subsys_state
*bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:353:18: warning: no previous prototype for
‘bpf_iter_css_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
353 | __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:
../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c: In function ‘bpf_iter_css_new’:
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to
‘__compiletime_assert_322’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
failed: sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css)
425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
__compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro
‘__compiletime_assert’
406 | prefix ## suffix();
\
| ^~~~~~
./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘_compiletime_assert’
425 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
__compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
‘compiletime_assert’
39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond),
msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: "
#condition)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:313:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
313 | BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) !=
sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));


The reason seems on 32-bit machine, sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css) is 24
and sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) is 16.

I was wondering whether the BUILD_BUG_ON check is necessary. Looking at
the struct bpf_list_node and struct bpf_list_node_kern wich are very
similay to bpf_iter_css, I didn't see the BUILD_BUG_ON check when
convert from (struct bpf_list_node *) to (struct bpf_list_node_kern *)

/* Non-opaque version of bpf_list_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */
struct bpf_list_node_kern {
struct list_head list_head;
void *owner;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));

struct bpf_list_node {
__u64 :64;
__u64 :64;
__u64 :64;
} __attribute__((aligned(8)));

__bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
struct bpf_list_node *node,
void *meta__ign, u64 off)
{
struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;

}



2023-10-11 05:32:53

by Chuyi Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] bpf: Introduce css open-coded iterator kfuncs



在 2023/10/11 12:44, Chuyi Zhou 写道:
>
>
> 在 2023/10/7 20:45, Chuyi Zhou 写道:
>> This Patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy} which allow
>> creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_css in open-coded iterator
>> style. These kfuncs actually wrapps css_next_descendant_{pre, post}.
>> css_iter can be used to:
>>
>> 1) iterating a sepcific cgroup tree with pre/post/up order
>>
>> 2) iterating cgroup_subsystem in BPF Prog, like
>> for_each_mem_cgroup_tree/cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre in kernel.
>>
>> The API design is consistent with cgroup_iter. bpf_iter_css_new accepts
>> parameters defining iteration order and starting css. Here we also reuse
>> BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_PRE, BPF_CGROUP_ITER_DESCENDANTS_POST,
>> BPF_CGROUP_ITER_ANCESTORS_UP enums.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c                      | 59 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  3 +
>>   .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |  6 ++
>>   3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
>> index 810378f04fbc..9c6ad892ae82 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
>> @@ -294,3 +294,62 @@ static int __init bpf_cgroup_iter_init(void)
>>   }
>>   late_initcall(bpf_cgroup_iter_init);
>> +
>> +struct bpf_iter_css {
>> +    __u64 __opaque[3];
>> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> +
>> +struct bpf_iter_css_kern {
>> +    struct cgroup_subsys_state *start;
>> +    struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos;
>> +    unsigned int flags;
>> +} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>> +
>> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
>> +        struct cgroup_subsys_state *start, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> +    struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;
>> +
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct
>> bpf_iter_css));
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) !=
>> __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css));
>> +
>
> This would cause the fail of netdev/build_32bit CI
> (https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/790929/13412333/build_32bit/stderr):
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings: warning: ignored by one of the
> .gitignore files
> ../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:308:17: warning: no previous prototype for
> ‘bpf_iter_css_new’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>   308 | __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css *it,
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:332:41: warning: no previous prototype for
> ‘bpf_iter_css_next’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>   332 | __bpf_kfunc struct cgroup_subsys_state
> *bpf_iter_css_next(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
>       |                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:353:18: warning: no previous prototype for
> ‘bpf_iter_css_destroy’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>   353 | __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it)
>       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from <command-line>:
> ../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c: In function ‘bpf_iter_css_new’:
> ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to
> ‘__compiletime_assert_322’ declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css)
>   425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |                                             ^
> ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro
> ‘__compiletime_assert’
>   406 |                         prefix ## suffix();         \
>       |                         ^~~~~~
> ./../include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘_compiletime_assert’
>   425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘compiletime_assert’
>    39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond),
> msg)
>       |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
>    50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: "
> #condition)
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c:313:9: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
>   313 |         BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) !=
> sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css));
>
>
> The reason seems on 32-bit machine, sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css) is 24
> and sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) is 16.
>
> I was wondering whether the BUILD_BUG_ON check is necessary. Looking at
> the struct bpf_list_node and struct bpf_list_node_kern wich are very
> similay to bpf_iter_css, I didn't see the BUILD_BUG_ON check when
> convert from (struct bpf_list_node *) to (struct bpf_list_node_kern *)
>
> /* Non-opaque version of bpf_list_node in uapi/linux/bpf.h */
> struct bpf_list_node_kern {
>     struct list_head list_head;
>     void *owner;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> struct bpf_list_node {
>     __u64 :64;
>     __u64 :64;
>     __u64 :64;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
>                     struct bpf_list_node *node,
>                     void *meta__ign, u64 off)
> {
>     struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)node;
>
> }
>

or we can change the BUILD_BUG_ON check, like bpf_timer_kern in
bpf_timer_init:

--- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup_iter.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_css_new(struct bpf_iter_css
*it,
{
struct bpf_iter_css_kern *kit = (void *)it;

- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) != sizeof(struct
bpf_iter_css));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) > sizeof(struct
bpf_iter_css));
BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css_kern) !=
__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_css));

kit->start = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 773be9a221f5..0772545568f1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_new(struct
bpf_iter_task *it,
{
struct bpf_iter_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;

- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) != sizeof(struct
bpf_iter_task));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) > sizeof(struct
bpf_iter_task));
BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) !=
__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task));