Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 7d730f1bf6f3 Add linux-next specific files for 20231005
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1716036e680000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f532286be4fff4b5
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=831ba898b5db8d5617ea
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1d7f28a4398f/disk-7d730f1b.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d454d124268e/vmlinux-7d730f1b.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dbca966175cb/bzImage-7d730f1b.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: [email protected]
kernel_init+0x1c/0x2a0 init/main.c:1437
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5208 at mm/memcontrol.c:7552 mem_cgroup_migrate+0x2fa/0x390 mm/memcontrol.c:7552
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 5208 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc4-next-20231005-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023
RIP: 0010:mem_cgroup_migrate+0x2fa/0x390 mm/memcontrol.c:7552
Code: f7 ff e9 36 ff ff ff 80 3d 84 b2 d1 0c 00 0f 85 54 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 a0 9e 9b 8a 48 89 ef e8 0d 5c df ff c6 05 68 b2 d1 0c 01 <0f> 0b e9 37 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 e0 9a 9b 8a 48 89 df e8 f0 5b df ff
RSP: 0018:ffffc90004b2fa38 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea0005338000 RCX: ffffc90005439000
RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81e76463 RDI: ffffffff8ae96da0
RBP: ffffea0001d98000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff1d9db9a
R10: ffffffff8ecedcd7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000200 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001d98018
FS: 00007fc15e89d6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000001b31820000 CR3: 000000007f5e1000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
hugetlbfs_migrate_folio fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1066 [inline]
hugetlbfs_migrate_folio+0xd0/0x120 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1049
move_to_new_folio+0x183/0x690 mm/migrate.c:966
unmap_and_move_huge_page mm/migrate.c:1428 [inline]
migrate_hugetlbs mm/migrate.c:1546 [inline]
migrate_pages+0x16ac/0x27c0 mm/migrate.c:1900
migrate_to_node mm/mempolicy.c:1072 [inline]
do_migrate_pages+0x43e/0x690 mm/mempolicy.c:1171
kernel_migrate_pages+0x59b/0x780 mm/mempolicy.c:1682
__do_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1700 [inline]
__se_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1696 [inline]
__x64_sys_migrate_pages+0x96/0x100 mm/mempolicy.c:1696
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fc15da7cae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fc15e89d0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000100
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc15db9bf80 RCX: 00007fc15da7cae9
RDX: 0000000020000340 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 00007fc15dac847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000200003c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fc15db9bf80 R15: 00007ffd87d7c058
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 05:37:43AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 7d730f1bf6f3 Add linux-next specific files for 20231005
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1716036e680000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f532286be4fff4b5
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=831ba898b5db8d5617ea
> compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1d7f28a4398f/disk-7d730f1b.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d454d124268e/vmlinux-7d730f1b.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dbca966175cb/bzImage-7d730f1b.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: [email protected]
>
> kernel_init+0x1c/0x2a0 init/main.c:1437
> ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5208 at mm/memcontrol.c:7552 mem_cgroup_migrate+0x2fa/0x390 mm/memcontrol.c:7552
This is the earlier version of the hugetlb cgroup accounting patches
that trigger on an uncharged hugetlbfs:
7547 /*
7548 * Note that it is normal to see !memcg for a hugetlb folio.
7549 * It could have been allocated when memory_hugetlb_accounting was not
7550 * selected, for e.g.
7551 */
7552 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg, old);
It's been fixed in the revision that's in the latest next release:
7539 /*
7540 * Note that it is normal to see !memcg for a hugetlb folio.
7541 * For e.g, itt could have been allocated when memory_hugetlb_accounting
7542 * was not selected.
7543 */
7544 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(old) && !memcg, old);
7545 if (!memcg)
7546 return;
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1 PID: 5208 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc4-next-20231005-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023
> RIP: 0010:mem_cgroup_migrate+0x2fa/0x390 mm/memcontrol.c:7552
> Code: f7 ff e9 36 ff ff ff 80 3d 84 b2 d1 0c 00 0f 85 54 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 a0 9e 9b 8a 48 89 ef e8 0d 5c df ff c6 05 68 b2 d1 0c 01 <0f> 0b e9 37 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 e0 9a 9b 8a 48 89 df e8 f0 5b df ff
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90004b2fa38 EFLAGS: 00010246
> RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea0005338000 RCX: ffffc90005439000
> RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81e76463 RDI: ffffffff8ae96da0
> RBP: ffffea0001d98000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff1d9db9a
> R10: ffffffff8ecedcd7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 0000000000000200 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001d98018
> FS: 00007fc15e89d6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000001b31820000 CR3: 000000007f5e1000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> hugetlbfs_migrate_folio fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1066 [inline]
> hugetlbfs_migrate_folio+0xd0/0x120 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1049
> move_to_new_folio+0x183/0x690 mm/migrate.c:966
> unmap_and_move_huge_page mm/migrate.c:1428 [inline]
> migrate_hugetlbs mm/migrate.c:1546 [inline]
> migrate_pages+0x16ac/0x27c0 mm/migrate.c:1900
> migrate_to_node mm/mempolicy.c:1072 [inline]
> do_migrate_pages+0x43e/0x690 mm/mempolicy.c:1171
> kernel_migrate_pages+0x59b/0x780 mm/mempolicy.c:1682
> __do_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1700 [inline]
> __se_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1696 [inline]
> __x64_sys_migrate_pages+0x96/0x100 mm/mempolicy.c:1696
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7fc15da7cae9
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007fc15e89d0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000100
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc15db9bf80 RCX: 00007fc15da7cae9
> RDX: 0000000020000340 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: 00007fc15dac847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 00000000200003c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fc15db9bf80 R15: 00007ffd87d7c058
> </TASK>
>
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
>
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
>
> If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
#syz fix: next-20231010
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 4:20 PM Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the earlier version of the hugetlb cgroup accounting patches
> that trigger on an uncharged hugetlbfs:
>
> 7547 /*
> 7548 * Note that it is normal to see !memcg for a hugetlb folio.
> 7549 * It could have been allocated when memory_hugetlb_accounting was not
> 7550 * selected, for e.g.
> 7551 */
> 7552 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg, old);
>
> It's been fixed in the revision that's in the latest next release:
>
> 7539 /*
> 7540 * Note that it is normal to see !memcg for a hugetlb folio.
> 7541 * For e.g, itt could have been allocated when memory_hugetlb_accounting
> 7542 * was not selected.
> 7543 */
> 7544 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(old) && !memcg, old);
> 7545 if (!memcg)
> 7546 return;
>
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 1 PID: 5208 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc4-next-20231005-syzkaller #0
> > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023
> > RIP: 0010:mem_cgroup_migrate+0x2fa/0x390 mm/memcontrol.c:7552
> > Code: f7 ff e9 36 ff ff ff 80 3d 84 b2 d1 0c 00 0f 85 54 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 a0 9e 9b 8a 48 89 ef e8 0d 5c df ff c6 05 68 b2 d1 0c 01 <0f> 0b e9 37 ff ff ff 48 c7 c6 e0 9a 9b 8a 48 89 df e8 f0 5b df ff
> > RSP: 0018:ffffc90004b2fa38 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > RAX: 0000000000040000 RBX: ffffea0005338000 RCX: ffffc90005439000
> > RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffffffff81e76463 RDI: ffffffff8ae96da0
> > RBP: ffffea0001d98000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff1d9db9a
> > R10: ffffffff8ecedcd7 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> > R13: 0000000000000200 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001d98018
> > FS: 00007fc15e89d6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000001b31820000 CR3: 000000007f5e1000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > hugetlbfs_migrate_folio fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1066 [inline]
> > hugetlbfs_migrate_folio+0xd0/0x120 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1049
> > move_to_new_folio+0x183/0x690 mm/migrate.c:966
> > unmap_and_move_huge_page mm/migrate.c:1428 [inline]
> > migrate_hugetlbs mm/migrate.c:1546 [inline]
> > migrate_pages+0x16ac/0x27c0 mm/migrate.c:1900
> > migrate_to_node mm/mempolicy.c:1072 [inline]
> > do_migrate_pages+0x43e/0x690 mm/mempolicy.c:1171
> > kernel_migrate_pages+0x59b/0x780 mm/mempolicy.c:1682
> > __do_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1700 [inline]
> > __se_sys_migrate_pages mm/mempolicy.c:1696 [inline]
> > __x64_sys_migrate_pages+0x96/0x100 mm/mempolicy.c:1696
> > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
> > do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> > RIP: 0033:0x7fc15da7cae9
> > Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007fc15e89d0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000100
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fc15db9bf80 RCX: 00007fc15da7cae9
> > RDX: 0000000020000340 RSI: 0000000000000080 RDI: 0000000000000000
> > RBP: 00007fc15dac847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 00000000200003c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fc15db9bf80 R15: 00007ffd87d7c058
> > </TASK>
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> > syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
> >
> > syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> >
> > If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
> > #syz fix: exact-commit-title
>
> #syz fix: next-20231010
>
Thanks for sharing the info and updating the issue!
If there's no fixing commit (the faulty series is dropped or
replaced), it's better to just invalidate the report:
#syz invalid
Otherwise, as in this case, syzbot would start looking for the
"next-20231010" commit (and won't find it because it's a tag) and,
after some time, start complaining that no such commit is reachable
from any of the master branches of the tested trees.
--
Aleksandr