Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro
Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
index d0dd659834ee..69c5b332fd7c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
@@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ struct qlge_net_req_iocb {
*/
struct wqicb {
__le16 len;
-#define Q_LEN_V (1 << 4)
+#define Q_LEN_V BIT(4)
#define Q_LEN_CPP_CONT 0x0000
#define Q_LEN_CPP_16 0x0001
#define Q_LEN_CPP_32 0x0002
@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ struct cqicb {
#define FLAGS_LI 0x40
#define FLAGS_LC 0x80
__le16 len;
-#define LEN_V (1 << 4)
+#define LEN_V BIT(4)
#define LEN_CPP_CONT 0x0000
#define LEN_CPP_32 0x0001
#define LEN_CPP_64 0x0002
--
2.25.1
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 06:35:58AM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro
>
> Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <[email protected]>
Hi Nandha,
I am assuming that checkpatch clean ups are acceptable, perhaps
even desired, in staging. So this patch seems appropriate to me.
I do, however, see a lot more potential uses of BIT() in qlge.h.
Could you take a second look?
...
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:18:14AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 06:35:58AM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> > Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
> > CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Nandha,
>
> I am assuming that checkpatch clean ups are acceptable, perhaps
> even desired, in staging. So this patch seems appropriate to me.
>
> I do, however, see a lot more potential uses of BIT() in qlge.h.
> Could you take a second look?
>
> ...
Hi Simon,
I will look into it and update the patch
Thanks,
Nandha Kumar Singaram