kstrndup() and kstrdup_and_replace() in clkctrl_get_name() can perform
dynamic memory allocation. So clkctrl_name needs to be freed when
provider->clkdm_name is NULL.
Fixes: bd46cd0b802d ("clk: ti: clkctrl: check return value of kasprintf()")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
---
v2 and v3: fix commit info.
drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
index 607e34d8e289..cb4aa8a45bb2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
@@ -591,6 +591,7 @@ static void __init _ti_omap4_clkctrl_setup(struct device_node *node)
provider->clkdm_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
"%s_clkdm", clkctrl_name);
if (!provider->clkdm_name) {
+ kfree(clkctrl_name);
kfree(provider);
return;
}
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:30:10PM +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> kstrndup() and kstrdup_and_replace() in clkctrl_get_name() can perform
> dynamic memory allocation. So clkctrl_name needs to be freed when
> provider->clkdm_name is NULL.
> Fixes: bd46cd0b802d ("clk: ti: clkctrl: check return value of kasprintf()")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> v2 and v3: fix commit info.
I believe I gave you my Rb tag. It's your responsibility to care it on if you
send a new version. Otherwise, please tell what makes you think that tag should
not be here?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On 31/10/2023 18:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:30:10PM +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
>> kstrndup() and kstrdup_and_replace() in clkctrl_get_name() can perform
>> dynamic memory allocation. So clkctrl_name needs to be freed when
>> provider->clkdm_name is NULL.
>
>> Fixes: bd46cd0b802d ("clk: ti: clkctrl: check return value of kasprintf()")
>> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> v2 and v3: fix commit info.
>
> I believe I gave you my Rb tag. It's your responsibility to care it on if you
> send a new version. Otherwise, please tell what makes you think that tag should
> not be here?
Do you mean "Reviewed-by"? I checked the previous emails and
"lore.kernel.org" and didn’t find this tag in any related emails. I am
not sure what happened. Can you please resend it?
Thanks,
Hangyu
>