Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
between commit:
52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")
from the mm tree and commit:
cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
from the asm-generic tree.
I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 09/18/23 at 10:10am, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")
Thanks a lot for fixing the conflict. I rebased the crash_core
refactoring code on linus's tree, so didn't notice ia64 arch has been
removed in next tree.
>
> from the mm tree and commit:
>
> cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
>
> from the asm-generic tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:10:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")
>
> from the mm tree and commit:
>
> cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
>
> from the asm-generic tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the mm-nonmm-stable tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell