Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
Build log:
-----------
fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'net'?
416 | ret = -EINVAL;
| ^~~
| net
fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
only once for each function it appears in
fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
417 | goto out;
| ^~~~
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/log
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/details/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/config
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
>
> Build log:
> -----------
> fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
> function); did you mean 'net'?
> 416 | ret = -EINVAL;
> | ^~~
> | net
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> only once for each function it appears in
> fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
> 417 | goto out;
> | ^~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
>
> Links:
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/log
>
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/details/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/config
>
Is it W=1 build? I can't reproduce on btrfs tree with
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y and without W=1.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:38, Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
> >
> > Build log:
> > -----------
> > fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
> > fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
> > function); did you mean 'net'?
> > 416 | ret = -EINVAL;
> > | ^~~
> > | net
> > fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> > only once for each function it appears in
> > fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
> > 417 | goto out;
> > | ^~~~
> > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
> >
> > Links:
> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/log
> >
> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/details/
> > - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/
> > - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/config
> >
>
> Is it W=1 build? I can't reproduce on btrfs tree with
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y and without W=1.
My config did not set this
# CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
Do you think the system should auto select the above config as default when
following config gets enabled ?
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
(or)
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=y
- Naresh
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:29:42PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:38, Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
> > >
> > > Build log:
> > > -----------
> > > fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
> > > fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
> > > function); did you mean 'net'?
> > > 416 | ret = -EINVAL;
> > > | ^~~
> > > | net
> > > fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> > > only once for each function it appears in
> > > fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
> > > 417 | goto out;
> > > | ^~~~
> > > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/log
> > >
> > > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/details/
> > > - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/
> > > - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/config
> > >
> >
> > Is it W=1 build? I can't reproduce on btrfs tree with
> > CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y and without W=1.
>
> My config did not set this
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
OK.
>
> Do you think the system should auto select the above config as default when
> following config gets enabled ?
>
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=m
> (or)
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=y
>
Nope, leave it as is.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
>
> Build log:
> -----------
> fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
> function); did you mean 'net'?
> 416 | ret = -EINVAL;
> | ^~~
> | net
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> only once for each function it appears in
> fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
> 417 | goto out;
> | ^~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
Fixed in today's for-next snapshot, thanks.