From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Testing with lockdep enabled threw this warning from generic/081 in
fstests:
[ 2369.724151] ============================================
[ 2369.725805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 2369.727125] 6.7.0-rc2-dgc+ #1952 Not tainted
[ 2369.728647] --------------------------------------------
[ 2369.730197] systemd-udevd/389493 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 2369.732378] ffff888116a1a320 (&(et->table + i)->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: snapshot_map+0x13e/0x7f0
[ 2369.736197]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 2369.738657] ffff8881098a4fd0 (&(et->table + i)->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: snapshot_map+0x136/0x7f0
[ 2369.742118]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 2369.744403] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 2369.746814] CPU0
[ 2369.747675] ----
[ 2369.748496] lock(&(et->table + i)->lock);
[ 2369.749877] lock(&(et->table + i)->lock);
[ 2369.751241]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 2369.753173] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 2369.754963] 4 locks held by systemd-udevd/389493:
[ 2369.756124] #0: ffff88811b3a1f48 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x69/0x190
[ 2369.758516] #1: ffff888121ceff10 (&md->io_barrier){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: dm_get_live_table+0x52/0xd0
[ 2369.760888] #2: ffff888110240078 (&s->lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: snapshot_map+0x12e/0x7f0
[ 2369.763254] #3: ffff8881098a4fd0 (&(et->table + i)->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: snapshot_map+0x136/0x7f0
[ 2369.765896]
stack backtrace:
[ 2369.767429] CPU: 3 PID: 389493 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-dgc+ #1952
[ 2369.770203] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
[ 2369.773771] Call Trace:
[ 2369.774657] <TASK>
[ 2369.775494] dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xc0
[ 2369.776765] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 2369.778031] print_deadlock_bug+0x220/0x2f0
[ 2369.779568] __lock_acquire+0x1255/0x2180
[ 2369.781013] lock_acquire+0xb9/0x2c0
[ 2369.782456] ? snapshot_map+0x13e/0x7f0
[ 2369.783927] ? snapshot_map+0x136/0x7f0
[ 2369.785240] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x70
[ 2369.786413] ? snapshot_map+0x13e/0x7f0
[ 2369.787482] snapshot_map+0x13e/0x7f0
[ 2369.788462] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x75/0x250
[ 2369.789650] __map_bio+0x1d7/0x200
[ 2369.790364] dm_submit_bio+0x17d/0x570
[ 2369.791387] __submit_bio+0x4a/0x80
[ 2369.792215] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x108/0x350
[ 2369.793357] submit_bio_noacct+0x115/0x450
[ 2369.794334] submit_bio+0x43/0x60
[ 2369.795112] mpage_readahead+0xf1/0x130
[ 2369.796037] ? blkdev_write_begin+0x30/0x30
[ 2369.797007] blkdev_readahead+0x15/0x20
[ 2369.797893] read_pages+0x5c/0x230
[ 2369.798703] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x143/0x190
[ 2369.799810] force_page_cache_ra+0x9a/0xc0
[ 2369.800754] page_cache_sync_ra+0x2e/0x50
[ 2369.801704] filemap_get_pages+0x112/0x630
[ 2369.802696] ? __lock_acquire+0x413/0x2180
[ 2369.803663] filemap_read+0xfc/0x3a0
[ 2369.804527] ? __might_sleep+0x42/0x70
[ 2369.805443] blkdev_read_iter+0x6d/0x150
[ 2369.806370] vfs_read+0x1a6/0x2d0
[ 2369.807148] ksys_read+0x71/0xf0
[ 2369.807936] __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x20
[ 2369.808810] do_syscall_64+0x3c/0xe0
[ 2369.809746] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
[ 2369.810914] RIP: 0033:0x7f9f14dbb03d
Turns out that dm-snap holds two hash-bl locks at the same time,
so we need nesting semantics to ensure lockdep understands what is
going on.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 2 +-
include/linux/list_bl.h | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-snap.c b/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
index bf7a574499a3..cd97d5cb295d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static void dm_exception_table_lock_init(struct dm_snapshot *s, chunk_t chunk,
static void dm_exception_table_lock(struct dm_exception_table_lock *lock)
{
hlist_bl_lock(lock->complete_slot);
- hlist_bl_lock(lock->pending_slot);
+ hlist_bl_lock_nested(lock->pending_slot, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
}
static void dm_exception_table_unlock(struct dm_exception_table_lock *lock)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index 990ad8e24e0b..0e3e60c10563 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_lock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
spin_lock(&b->lock);
}
+static inline void hlist_bl_lock_nested(struct hlist_bl_head *b, int subclass)
+{
+ spin_lock_nested(&b->lock, subclass);
+}
+
static inline void hlist_bl_unlock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
{
spin_unlock(&b->lock);
@@ -125,6 +130,11 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_lock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
bit_spin_lock(0, (unsigned long *)b);
}
+static inline void hlist_bl_lock_nested(struct hlist_bl_head *b, int subclass)
+{
+ hlist_bl_lock(b);
+}
+
static inline void hlist_bl_unlock(struct hlist_bl_head *b)
{
__bit_spin_unlock(0, (unsigned long *)b);
--
2.42.0