2023-12-11 02:57:53

by Srikar Dronamraju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/smp: Topology and shared processor optimizations

* Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> [2023-11-09 11:19:28]:

Hi Michael,

> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor
> systems.
>
>

Did you get a chance to look at this patchset?
Do you see this getting pulled into your merge branch?
I havent seen any comments that requires a change from the current patchset.

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju


2023-12-11 10:47:19

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] powerpc/smp: Topology and shared processor optimizations

Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> writes:
> * Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> [2023-11-09 11:19:28]:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>> PowerVM systems configured in shared processors mode have some unique
>> challenges. Some device-tree properties will be missing on a shared
>> processor. Hence some sched domains may not make sense for shared processor
>> systems.
>>
>>
>
> Did you get a chance to look at this patchset?
> Do you see this getting pulled into your merge branch?
> I havent seen any comments that requires a change from the current patchset.

I was assuming you'd send another version to at least incorporate the
clarifications you posted.

And I wasn't really sure the discussion about the prink_once() change
was resolved. Anyway I'll check with Aneesh.

cheers