Add support for LDO5 regulator. This is used by IPQ9574 USB.
Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
index 09c471a0ba2e..d1be9568025e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &mp5496_smps, "s1" },
{ "s2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 2, &mp5496_smps, "s2" },
{ "l2", QCOM_SMD_RPM_LDOA, 2, &mp5496_ldoa2, "l2" },
+ { "l5", QCOM_SMD_RPM_LDOA, 5, &mp5496_ldoa2, "l5" },
{}
};
--
2.34.1
On 12/14/23 11:40, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Add support for LDO5 regulator. This is used by IPQ9574 USB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> ---
Why did you remove the bindings since the last revision?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
Konrad
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 07:26:24PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/23 11:40, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Add support for LDO5 regulator. This is used by IPQ9574 USB.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> Why did you remove the bindings since the last revision?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
Oops! Sorry. Sent the wrong patch.
Will send the correct one.
Varada
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:10:52 +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Add support for LDO5 regulator. This is used by IPQ9574 USB.
>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regulator: qcom_smd: Add LDO5 MP5496 regulator
commit: ad663ce6780477177e301756ade6cf236f36ae4c
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark