Trying to probe update_sd_lb_stats() using perf results in the below
message in the kernel log:
trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function _text
This is because 'perf probe' specifies the kprobe location as an offset
from '_text':
$ sudo perf probe -D update_sd_lb_stats
p:probe/update_sd_lb_stats _text+1830728
However, the error message is misleading and doesn't help convey the
actual notrace function that is being probed. Fix this by looking up the
actual function name that is being probed. With this fix, we now get the
below message in the kernel log:
trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <[email protected]>
---
v4: Use printk format specifier %ps with probe address to lookup the
symbol, as suggested by Masami.
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 3d7a180a8427..0017404d6e8d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ static int __register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
return -EINVAL;
if (within_notrace_func(tk)) {
- pr_warn("Could not probe notrace function %s\n",
- trace_kprobe_symbol(tk));
+ pr_warn("Could not probe notrace function %ps\n",
+ (void *)trace_kprobe_address(tk));
return -EINVAL;
}
base-commit: 4758560fa268cecfa1144f015aa9f2525d164b7e
--
2.43.0
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 10:47:02 +0530
Naveen N Rao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Trying to probe update_sd_lb_stats() using perf results in the below
> message in the kernel log:
> trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function _text
>
> This is because 'perf probe' specifies the kprobe location as an offset
> from '_text':
> $ sudo perf probe -D update_sd_lb_stats
> p:probe/update_sd_lb_stats _text+1830728
>
> However, the error message is misleading and doesn't help convey the
> actual notrace function that is being probed. Fix this by looking up the
> actual function name that is being probed. With this fix, we now get the
> below message in the kernel log:
> trace_kprobe: Could not probe notrace function update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0
>
OK, this looks good to me. let me pick this.
Thank you!
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <[email protected]>
> ---
> v4: Use printk format specifier %ps with probe address to lookup the
> symbol, as suggested by Masami.
>
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index 3d7a180a8427..0017404d6e8d 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ static int __register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (within_notrace_func(tk)) {
> - pr_warn("Could not probe notrace function %s\n",
> - trace_kprobe_symbol(tk));
> + pr_warn("Could not probe notrace function %ps\n",
> + (void *)trace_kprobe_address(tk));
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
>
> base-commit: 4758560fa268cecfa1144f015aa9f2525d164b7e
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>