On Mon 18-12-23 22:18:11, Baokun Li wrote:
> In ext4_move_extents(), moved_len is only updated when all moves are
> successfully executed, and only discards orig_inode and donor_inode
> preallocations when moved_len is not zero. When the loop fails to exit
> after successfully moving some extents, moved_len is not updated and
> remains at 0, so it does not discard the preallocations.
>
> If the moved extents overlap with the preallocated extents, the
> overlapped extents are freed twice in ext4_mb_release_inode_pa() and
> ext4_process_freed_data() (as described in commit 94d7c16cbbbd), and
> bb_free is incremented twice. Hence when trim is executed, a zero-division
> bug is triggered in mb_update_avg_fragment_size() because bb_free is not
> zero and bb_fragments is zero.
>
> Therefore, update move_len after each extent move to avoid the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Wei Chen <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: xingwei lee <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAO4mrferzqBUnCag8R3m2zf897ts9UEuhjFQGPtODT92rYyR2Q@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: fcf6b1b729bc ("ext4: refactor ext4_move_extents code base")
> CC: [email protected] # 3.18
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> index 3aa57376d9c2..4b9b503c6346 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/move_extent.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> */
> ext4_double_up_write_data_sem(orig_inode, donor_inode);
> /* Swap original branches with new branches */
> - move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> + *moved_len += move_extent_per_page(o_filp, donor_inode,
> orig_page_index, donor_page_index,
> offset_in_page, cur_len,
> unwritten, &ret);
Although this is currently fine, I think ext4_move_extents() should be
careful and zero out *moved_len before it starts using it.
> @@ -682,7 +682,6 @@ ext4_move_extents(struct file *o_filp, struct file *d_filp, __u64 orig_blk,
> o_start += cur_len;
> d_start += cur_len;
> }
> - *moved_len = o_start - orig_blk;
> if (*moved_len > len)
> *moved_len = len;
So I'm not sure the *moved_len > len condition can ever trigger but if it
does, we'd need to check it whenever we are returning moved_len. So either
I'd delete the condition or move it to the out label.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR