2023-12-18 05:17:22

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the execve tree with the net-next tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the execve tree got a conflict in:

MAINTAINERS

between commit:

cbaa28f970a1 ("MAINTAINERS: add Rust PHY abstractions for ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY")

from the net-next tree and commit:

0a8a952a75f2 ("ELF, MAINTAINERS: specifically mention ELF")

from the execve tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc MAINTAINERS
index 1f53b4c593dd,08278b9ede48..000000000000
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@@ -7919,15 -7797,7 +7919,15 @@@ F: include/uapi/linux/mdio.
F: include/uapi/linux/mii.h
F: net/core/of_net.c

+ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY [RUST]
+M: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
+R: Trevor Gross <[email protected]>
+L: [email protected]
+L: [email protected]
+S: Maintained
+F: rust/kernel/net/phy.rs
+
- EXEC & BINFMT API
+ EXEC & BINFMT API, ELF
R: Eric Biederman <[email protected]>
R: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
L: [email protected]


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature